consent Flashcards

(22 cards)

1
Q

definition of consent

A

to give permission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is implied consent?

A

when a person is not specifically asked if they agree to something being done to them, but they behave as if they understand and agree.
eg going outside - you’re consenting to people knocking into you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ag ref (1981)

A

court held: as a matter of policy a person cannot consent to anything resulting in abh or greater harm
further confirmed in r v brown and others 1993

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the general rule of consent?

A

you cannot consent to any injury beyond assault or battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the times you can consent to more than an assault or battery?

A

•sports
•surgery
•dangerous exhibitions
•cosmetic enhancements
•horseplay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

tattoos and piercings

A

justification: we can consent to them du to our free will and freedom of expression - for mental health and wellbeing
HOWEVER:
tattoos you must be 18+ to consent as under 18s don’t have the capacity to consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

sports

A

justification: mental health, physical health, economy (provides people jobs, people go and watch sports), entertainment
•for example in the daniel james 2008- he got paralysed in a rugby game
HOWEVER
you can only consent to injuries with a sport that are rules within the game - cannot go outside of the rules (as in r v billinghust 1978)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

r v billinghust 1978

A

you can only consent to injuries with a sport that are rules within the game - cannot go outside of the rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

daniel james 2008

A

paralysed playing rugby

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

horseplay

A

definition: usually younger people playing and messing on
justification: mental health, physical and resilience
r v jones and others 1987

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

r v jones and others 1987

A

horseplay:
two school mates thrown a pupil into the air with the intention of catching them. unfortunately they had dropped them resulting in serious injury. got convicted of gbh.
however this was appealed
the courts held: the convictions were quashed, as it was horseplay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

surgery

A

justification: life saving and life enhancing (this can also include cosmetic surgery)

consent form for surgeries:
16+: have to sign their own
under 16: parents have to sign it
HOWEVER
if the parents don’t sign it the hospital can appeal it to the courts eg in Re A 2000
for example:
gillick competence: sometimes if you’re under 16 and you’re mature enough you can consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

sexual activity

A

•brown and others 1993
•emmett 1999
•slingsby 1995

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

emmett 1999

A

a man and his partner were consenting to asphyxiation and burning with lighter fluid
court held: consent was not valid due to the degree of injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

brown and others 1993

A

In this case, a group of consenting adults engaged in sadomasochistic activities that caused injuries (like cuts and bruising). The court held:
Consent was NOT a defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

slingsby 1995

A

a man and a woman were having consensual sex - that caused injuries that amounted to battery or abh. however she got an infection in hospital and died
courts found the man not guilty

17
Q

belief in consent

A

established in r v morgan 1976 - if the defendant has an honest belief that the person gave them consent they are innocent
an honest belief is a subjective belief
HOWEVER
this does not apply to rape and sexual assault cases. cases of rape + sexual assault the belief in consent must be a reasonable one - making it objective (eg r v richardson and irwin 1999)

18
Q

r v richardson and irwin 1999

A

if the defendant is intoxicated then the belief in consent must be reasonable

19
Q

valid consent

A

valid consent is:
•voluntary
•informed
•with capacity to make the decision

21
Q

capacity to consent

A

surrounding age
gillick competence: a child under 16 can sometimes consent to medical precedures if they have sufficient maturity

22
Q

consent to your own death

A

unde s.2 suicide act 1961 it establishes that you can’t consent to your own death
HOWEVER
there is a bill being made that says adults 18 and over who have 18 months left to live can apply for euthanasia - terminally ill adult (end of life) bill 2025