Consent Flashcards

(16 cards)

1
Q

Which cases show that consent can’t be used as a defence for anything ABH and above?

A

R v Brown 1993, R v Wilson 1996

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What exceptions did AG Ref (6 of 1980) [1981] give?

A
  1. Tatoos
  2. Piercings
  3. sport
  4. Horseplay
  5. surgery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reference which gave exceptions to the ABH+ Rule

A

AG Ref (6 of 1980) [1981]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which section of which law outlawed the use of consent for sexual gratification?

A

Section 71 Domestic abuse act 2021 says that consent is not a defence to sections 18,20,47 OAPA. Section 71(4) says this may not apply for STD transmission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case which shows injury in sport must be lawful for no conviction?

A

R v coney 1882

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case which shows horseplay is allowed

A

R v jones 1986

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Gillick competence case and meaning

A

Gillick 1986: children under 16 have the legal competence to ask for medical advice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v BM 2018

A

50 shades defence denied: defence which says extreme sexual practice should be allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Consent to serious harm for sexual gratification is not a defence (section of law)

A

Section 71 Domestic Abuse Act 2021

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Section 71 Domestic Abuse Act 2021

A

Consent to serious harm for sexual gratification is not a defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Morgan (1976)

A

The defendant must have an HONEST belief that the victim is
consenting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case to show The defendant must have an HONEST belief that the victim is
consenting.

A

R v Morgan 1976

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What case shows that the honest belief in consent is reasonable if intoxicated?

A

R v Richardson and Irwin (1999)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Richardson and Irwin (1999)

A

Belief in consent must be reasonable if intoxicated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did r v Olugboja 1982 say?

A

One must voluntarily and willingly consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What case shows that one must voluntarily and willingly consent?

A

R v olugboja 1982