Which cases show that consent can’t be used as a defence for anything ABH and above?
R v Brown 1993, R v Wilson 1996
What exceptions did AG Ref (6 of 1980) [1981] give?
Reference which gave exceptions to the ABH+ Rule
AG Ref (6 of 1980) [1981]
Which section of which law outlawed the use of consent for sexual gratification?
Section 71 Domestic abuse act 2021 says that consent is not a defence to sections 18,20,47 OAPA. Section 71(4) says this may not apply for STD transmission.
Case which shows injury in sport must be lawful for no conviction?
R v coney 1882
Case which shows horseplay is allowed
R v jones 1986
Gillick competence case and meaning
Gillick 1986: children under 16 have the legal competence to ask for medical advice
R v BM 2018
50 shades defence denied: defence which says extreme sexual practice should be allowed
Consent to serious harm for sexual gratification is not a defence (section of law)
Section 71 Domestic Abuse Act 2021
Section 71 Domestic Abuse Act 2021
Consent to serious harm for sexual gratification is not a defence
R v Morgan (1976)
The defendant must have an HONEST belief that the victim is
consenting.
Case to show The defendant must have an HONEST belief that the victim is
consenting.
R v Morgan 1976
What case shows that the honest belief in consent is reasonable if intoxicated?
R v Richardson and Irwin (1999)
R v Richardson and Irwin (1999)
Belief in consent must be reasonable if intoxicated
What did r v Olugboja 1982 say?
One must voluntarily and willingly consent
What case shows that one must voluntarily and willingly consent?
R v olugboja 1982