traditional conservatism key thinkers
thomas hobbes
edmund burke
michael oakeshott
one nation conservatism key thinkers
benjamin disraeli
neo liberalism key thinkers
robert nozick
neo conservatism key thinkers
ayn rand
key disagreement - human nature (human imperfection vs rational)
human imperfection = traditional/ one nation
hobbes - humans are irrational, needy and easily led. state should be used to control this
burke - humans cant cope with rational and abstract principles . must use empiricism / wisdom of tradition
____________________________
positive/ rational human nature = new right / neo-liberals
rand - self interested but capable of rational thought (rejects idea of human imperfection)
nozick - self ownership. everyone is entitled to their own way of life. forced redistribution is bad. positive view human nature
key disagreement - the state
traditional conservative
(hobbes) - trade some freedoms for protection from the state. includes social/ economic intervention
strong state is needed to guarentee order and security
____________________________
one nation conservativism
(disraeli / oakeshott*) - one nation has greater influence of state in government in order to maintain social order and keep two nations of society together in one
. welfare support/ state to deal with disorder
*oakeshott normally trad con but one nation for state.
____________________________
new right conservatism
(nozick + rand) - small state to preserve liberty and freedom.
rand - ‘growth of the state is the gravest contemporary threat to individual freedom
rand - egotistical individualism / atomistic society
HOWEVER
small + powerful state to enforce law and order when lib ideas damaging to authority + tradition.
think THATCHER POLICY
key disagreement - society
(organic society/ natural vs atomistic/ collection of individuals)
traditional conservatives - organic society and paternalism
burke - organic society. all play a part in a wider thing. change to conserve + noblesse oblige
oakeshott - tradition to maintain society. revolution and big change = bad (1930s EUROPE AS AN EXAMPLE)
hobbes (hierarchy) - fixed at birth cant move up
(focus on collective and organicism of society) - it is how it is and thats how it will be
_____________________________
neo libs - atomistic society
rand - should focus on reason and not tradition
society only protects individual rights
/ hierarchy - anyone can move up if talented (fluid)
(focus on the individual)
key disagreement - the economy
free market
neo libs (rand)
- calls for uncontrolled, unregulated laissez faire econ. economic issues = the individuals problem not state.
tax = dependency culture + restricts individual liberty
neo-lib (nozick)
- tax is legalised theft
_____________________________
one nation (disraeli)
- tax supports the poor and avoids split in the nation.
state = big role in econ
paternalism = lifts others up
neo con
- pragmatic = state should intervene if it needs to (2008 crash)
key agreements - human nature
human imperfection (traditional and one nation)
hobbes (trad) - individuals are selfish and desire supremacy ‘humans are driven by a perpetual and restless desire for power’
disraeli - we cant understand reality so we must be guided by obligation and known institutions.
agreement = empiricism > rationalism
key agreements - the state
traditional con (hobbes)
- government exists to provide security and order. without state = war
(oakeshott) - state required to keep ‘ship of society’ afloat
neo-conservatives (rand)
- strong state to maintain law and order (not for ecom - no intervention for econ)
key agreements - society
organic society agreement = trad con and neo con
burke - organic society we all have role in order to ensure society runs smoothly ‘society is a contract’
rand - organic society but authoritarian
hierarchy and tradition agreement = trad con and neo con
burke - tradition creates social stability. change to preserve not change for sake of change. empiricism and known means should be preferred
rand (neo con) - focus on traditional values and roles of family. hierarchy should be preserved although individuals can move through hierarchal boundaries (talent)
key agreement - the economy
respect of private property (trad, NR)
burke (trad) - private property is vital for psychological security of individuals / moral wellbeing. stake in organic society
rand (neo con) - property gives people place in society. state should remove taxation to help people buy property.
+ neo lib (nozick) income is property and should not be taken by the state (legalised theft)
agree because property strengthens cohesions and encourages responsibility
+
free market capitalism (trad + nR +1 nation)
trad con (burke) - free market, laissez faire. smithonian economics
one nation (disraeli) - free markets sometimes need moderation though
neo con (rand) - no state intervention completetly free to respect individuals pursuit of self interest