define conspiracy
A conspiracy occurs when two or more people enter into agreement to commit an unlawful act, which can sometimes include civil actions.
describe the subject matter of an act of conspiracy
In order to constitute a conspiracy the subject matter of the agreement must be unlawful
what is the essence of the defence of conspiracy
The essence of the defence is the concluded agreement between the parties to commit an offence.
does an actual offence need to be committed in the defence of conspiracy
The actual offence need never be committed
what is the actus reus of conspiracy ?
The actus reus of conspiracy is the agreement
Two dimension:
1.The parties to the agreement
2.The objective of the agreement
can a person be found guilty of conspiracy if they abandon the agreement ?
The crime is committed when the agreement is made – any subsequent conduct cannot undo the crime
is impossibility a defence to conspiracy ?
If the agreement entered into relates to a specific endeavor which is impossible to achieve, no conviction will follow.
is factual impossibility a defence to conspiracy in Ireland
Factual impossibility not a defence – once the agreement, knowledge and intent to complete are there the fact that it is impossible to actually do it irrelevant
describe the case of DPP v Nock ?
what is the mens rea of conspiracy ?
where in the law does it make it an offence to conspire to commit a serious offence
S 71(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2006 - Makes it an offence to conspire to commit a serious offence (s 70 defines a serious offence as one which can be punished by at least 4 years imprisonment).
the offence of conspiracy permits the authorities to intervenes as early as possible, how is this justified ?
◦1) group criminality possess a dynamic that is potentially more dangerous than that of lone individuals
◦2) it is less likely that an individual who is part of a group will decide to abandon a crime
does every conspirator, have to be aware of each other ?
The various parties do not need to be aware of each other, provided all are part of the same conspiracy and overall plan - R v Porter [1980]
do the conspirators have to know the precise details of the plan ?