Courts Summary by Topic

Question 0

Cases on Due Process

Answer 0

• Washington ex re. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. Roberge

- Pennell v. City of San Jose

Question 1

Cases on Discrimination

Answer 1

• Jones v. Mayer
• Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel (I)
• Village of Arlington Heights, et. al. v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, et. al.
• Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel (II)

Question 2

Cases on eminent domain & takings

Answer 2

• Township of Franklin v. Tugwell
• Hadacheck v. Sebastian
• Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon
• New York Housing Authority v. Muller
• Fortson Investment Co. v. Oklahoma City
• State ex rel. Bruestle v. Rich
• Berman v. Parker
• Fred F. French Investing Co. v. City of New York
• Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York
• Agins v. City of Tiburon
• Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.
• Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank
• First English Evangelical Church v. County of Los Angeles
• Keystone Bituminous Coal Association v. DeBenedictis
• Pennell v. City of San Jose
• Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council

Question 3

Equal protection 14th

Answer 3

City of Cleburne, TX v. Cleburne Living Center

Pennell v. City of San Jose

Question 4

Exactions

Answer 4

Jenad, Inc. v. Village of Scarsdale
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission
Dolan v. Tigard

Question 5

First Amendment

Answer 5

• Thomas Cusack v. City of Chicago
• Young v. American Mini Theaters
• Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diego
• Members of City Council v. Vincent
• City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.
• Renton v. Playtime Theaters

Question 6

Group Homes

Answer 6

• Village of Belle Terre v. Borass
• Moore v. City of East Cleveland
• City of Cleburne, TX v. Cleburne Living Center

Question 7

Growth management

Answer 7

• Construction Industry Association of Sonoma County v. City of Petaluma
• Associated Home Builders of Greater East Bay v. City of Livermore

Question 8

Police power and zoning

Answer 8

• Cochran v. Preston
• Welch v. Swasey
• Eubank v. City of Richmond
• Hadacheck v. Sebastian
• Brett v. Building Commissioner of Brookline
• Miller v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles
• Zahn v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles
• Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.
• Nectow v. City of Cambridge
• Fischer v. Bedminster Township
• Akron v. Chapman
• Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los Angeles
• Golden v. Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo
• Fasano v. Board of County Commissioners of Washington County
• Village of Belle Terre v. Borass
• Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel (I)
• Baker v. City of Milwaukee
• City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
• Young v. American Mini Theaters
• Moore v. City of East Cleveland
• Oakwood at Madison v. Township of Madison et al.
• Village of Arlington Heights et al v. Metropolitan Housing Corporation et al.
• Agins v. City of Tiburon
• Wilson & Voss v. County of McHenry
• Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel (II)