What are the aims of the criminal justice system?
1.) Deterrence: putting people off
2.) Public protection: maintain order, prevent further harm
3.) Retribution: punishing for wrongdoings
4.) Rehabilitation: reforming criminals
What is said about changing approaches to justice?
GARLAND:
- 20th century —> rehabilitation
- 1970s —> retributive justice + harsher penalties (Newbury calls this their just desert)
Shown by a significant increase in imprisonment in the UK between 1970-2014.
What has there been uncertainty about within the changing approaches to justice?
What is said about the culture of control from left realism to right realism?
What is restorative justice?
What does Foucault suggest about surveillance?
FOUCAULT:
- Surveillance: monitoring + controlling behaviour of criminals.
- Leads to self surveillance.
What does Foucault say about the growth of surveillance?
What is the concept Foucault uses to describe contemporary societies?
What is the role of surveillance technology?
Surveillance technology:
(Technologies of power and disciplinary technologies - FOUCAULT)
- Enables the state to exercise disciplinary power over the whole population.
What does Lyon argue about surveillance in modern societies?
What are some round the clock surveillance technologies and what do they do?
How many cameras are installed across the UK?
What else is surveillance used for, other than around crime?
What are Internet Service Providers legally required to do?
Who is monitoring us according to Foucault?
How can you evaluate Foucault with synoptic surveillance?
MATHIESEN:
- In a contemporary society, it is not just the few who monitor the many.
- The media enables the many to monitor the few, e.g. by media stories on corrupt or immoral behaviour by politicians —> we live in a synopticon.
- Another example is where the public monitor each other through dashcams or helmet cams.
- The widespread ownership of cameras and camera phones means people can monitor the monitors e.g. by filming illegal behaviour by the police.
How can you use surveillance assemblages to evaluate Foucault?
HAGGERTY AND ERICSON:
- Surveillance technologies now ‘talk’ to one another, e.g. number plate recognition software and CCTV footage.
- Data doubles of individuals can be created and monitored e.g. through mobile phone communication, rather than monitoring the physical individual.
How can you use risk management to evaluate Foucault?
FEELY AND SIMON:
Surveillance is different now to Foucault:
1.) It focuses on groups rather than individuals.
2.) It uses calculations of risk
E.g. Airport screening checks, which are based on known risk factors.
The effect of this is to place entire social groups under suspicion. E.g. 2010 West Midlands police sought to introduce a counterterrorism scheme to surround two mainly Muslim suburbs of Birmingham with automatic number plate recognition cameras, thereby placing whole communities under suspicion.
—> The problem with risk management is the danger of a self fulfilling prophecy.
How can you use labelling to evaluate Foucault?
NORRIS AND ARMSTRONG:
- Research shows that CCTV operators make discriminatory judgements about who they should focus on. This results in targeting of young black males.
How can you use social media surveillance to evaluate Foucault?
LYON:
- Social media now means that we monitor each other.
- We often willingly volunteer information about ourselves which we upload to social media accounts.
- Enables us to be monitored.
- Social media companies then follow a market logic where they use this personal data to sell advertising which allows us to be targeted by companies.
What is Foucaults explanations for why punishments have changed over time?
Foucault: punishments have changed from sovereign power to disciplinary power.
- The decline in public forms of physical punishment is due to the changing structures of power in society.
- Public brutal punishments —> demonstrations of the supreme power of the sovereign over criminals. (Called this sovereign power).
- As sovereign power declined there developed a new form of state power and control over criminals. (Called this disciplinary power).
- Criminals were to be controlled and disciplined by surveillance
What does Rushe and Kirchheimer say about punishment, class domination and control?
RUSHE AND KIRCHHEIMER:
- Marxist perspective
- Punishments as apart of social control and class domination in unequal societies.
- They see the changing forms of punishment over time arising from the changing economic interests of the dominant class.
- Brutal punishments increased when there was plenty of labour and declined when there was a labour shortage.
What is the functionalist perspective to punishment?
DURKHEIM:
- Societies can only exist if they have value consensus that form moral ties binding communities together —> collective conscience. Laws are an expression of this.
What are the criticisms for the functionalist perspective to punishment?