Boundary maintenance - Durkheim & Cohen
Durkheim - the purpose of punishment is to reaffirm society’s shared rules, reinforcing social solidarity
Cohen - media coverage of crime and deviance often creates ‘folk devils’, dramatise wrongdoing and publicly shame the offender
Adaption and change - Durkheim
all change starts with an act of deviance
Too much crime means that there are not enough shared values
Too little crime means that society controls its members too much
Positive functions of crime - Davis & Polsky
Davis - prostitution acts as a safety valve for the release of men’s sexual frustrations without threatening the nuclear family
Polsky - pornography safely channels a variety of sexual desires away from alternatives
Cultural factors - Merton
society’s goals
Structural factors - Merton
economic inequality which causes strain
Merton - 5 adaptations to strain
conformity = accept the goals and the means
innovation = Accept the goals but reject the means - criminals
ritualism = reject the goals but accept the means
retreatism = reject the goals and the means
rebellion = reject the goals and the means, find new ways of living
Positives of Merton
studies show:
high rates of property crime
higher crime among poorer members
Negatives of Merton
Accepting official statistics
Too determinist
Ignores class/power structures
Cohen - subcultural strain theories
Status frustration - face a problem of adjustment to the low status they are given by society so they resolve this by rejecting these values
Alternative status hierarchy: inversion of values - delinquent subculture inverts the values of mainstream society
Cloward & Ohlin - three subcultures
Criminal - provides youths with apprenticeships and employment opportunities in crime
Conflict - results in high levels of social disorganisation and violence provides a release for frustration
Retreatist - not everyone who wants to be a criminal succeeds so they turn to a retreatist subculture based on drug use
Becker - deviance
deviant behaviour is simply behaviour that people label
Cicourel - negotiation of justice
officers’ typifications led them to concentrate on certain ‘types’, and results in law enforcement showing a class bias
justice is not fixed but negotiable
interactionists - crime stats
official crime statistics are socially constructed
the outcome depends on the label they attach to the individual affected by stereotypes
Lemert - primary & secondary deviance
primary deviance - acts that have not been publicly labelled and mostly go uncaught
secondary deviance = the result of societal reaction of labelling
master status - Lemert
once an individual is labelled others may come to see them only in terms of this label
deviance amplification spiral
the attempt to control deviance leads to an increase in the level of deviance
disintegrative and reintegrative shaming
disintegrative shaming - not only the crime but also the criminal is labelled as bad and the offender is excluded from society
reintegrative shaming - labelling the act but not the actor
rejection of official statistics - suicide
official statistics are socially constructed and tell us about the activities of the people who construct them, not the real rate of crime or suicide in society
official statistics are merely a record of the labels coroners attach to deaths
institutionalism
on admission, the inmate undergoes a ‘mortification of the self’, in which their old identity is symbolically ‘killed off’ and replaced by a new one: inmate
moral entrepreneurs
people who lead a ‘moral crusade’ to change the law
Marxism - capitalism is criminogenic
poverty may mean that crime is the only way for working class people to survive
alienation and lack of control may lead to frustration and aggression
the profit motive encourages a mentality of greed and self-interest
selective enforcement
powerless groups such as the working class and ethnic minorities are criminalised but the police tend to ignore the crimes of the more powerful (white collar crimes)
anti-determinism - Taylor et al
Marxism is too deterministic
crime is a meaningful action and a conscious choice that often has a political motive
white collar crime - occupational & corporate
occupational crime = committed by employees for their own personal gain often against the organisation for which they work
corporate crime = committed by employees for their organisation in pursuit of its goals