What are summary offences?
Assault, Battery, Simple criminal damage of £5,000 or less, Low value shoplifting (£200 in total)
Summary offences are less serious crimes that are typically handled in a magistrates’ court.
List examples of either-way offences.
Either-way offences can be tried in either a magistrates’ court or a crown court.
What constitutes an indictable only offence?
Indictable only offences are the most serious crimes and must be tried in a crown court.
True or False: A defendant charged with an indictable only offence can be tried in a magistrates’ court.
False
Indictable only offences must be tried on indictment in a crown court.
What is the prima facie right to bail?
There is a prima facie right to bail, but there are exceptions
A prima facie right means that the defendant is entitled to bail unless there are strong reasons to deny it.
List exceptions to the general right to bail.
These exceptions help ensure public safety.
Fill in the blank: A defendant may be refused bail if there are substantial grounds for believing they will _______.
abscond, commit further offences or interfere with witnesses
This addresses concerns about the defendant’s behavior while on bail.
What are the statutory factors to consider for bail?
These factors help the court assess the appropriateness of granting bail.
What is required for a confession to be admissible under S76 PACE 1984?
Prosecution must prove beyond all reasonable doubt that the confession was not obtained by oppression or unreliability
o S76 PACE 1984 mandatory exclusion for oppression
Defence to raise and prosecution to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that the confession was not obtained by oppression
Oppression includes torture, inhumane or degrading treatment, or the use/threat of violence.
Oppression can also extend to persistent, aggressive questioning, denial of sleep/food etc
o S76 PACE 1984 mandatory exclusion for unreliability
Confession has been obtained by anything said or done which was likely, in the circumstances existing at the time, to render unreliable any confession made as a consequence
Improper police conduct under PACE Code C – the Code of Practice for the Detention, Treatment and Questioning of Persons by Police Officers
Defence to raise and prosecution to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that the confession was not obtained unreliably
Unreliability of a confession does not exclude evidence obtained as a result
This ensures that confessions are obtained fairly.
What is a Turnbull direction?
A warning given when the case depends on the correctness of visual identification and the defence alleges it to be mistaken
This direction is crucial for the jury to consider the reliability of identification evidence.
What is the general rule regarding hearsay evidence?
Hearsay evidence is inadmissible
Hearsay refers to statements made outside of court that are presented to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
List statutory exceptions to the hearsay rule.
o Statutory exceptions:
Witness is unavailable (S116 CJA 2003) - Requirements:
Would have been admissible as oral evidence
Person is identifiable
Dead, unfit (ill, mental condition etc), outside UK and impractical to secure attendance, missing, fear
o Common law principles:
Res gestae – things said as a spontaneous reaction in the heat of the moment during the events in issue
Rationale: spontaneity reduces the risk of fabrication
o If all parties agree to admissibility of hearsay it may be admitted.
o Interest of justice:
Probative value, other evidence available, importance, circumstances in which statement made, reliability, whether oral evidence is available, challengeable, prejudice on the party facing it
This is a safety valve – allowing flexibility in unusual cases
These exceptions allow certain hearsay to be admissible under specific circumstances.
What is the general rule regarding bad character evidence?
It is inadmissible unless the prosecution applies to admit it
This rule helps ensure that a defendant is not judged based on their past rather than the current case.
What must the prosecution prove in a criminal case?
Each element of the offence beyond all reasonable doubt
This high standard of proof is essential in criminal law to protect the rights of the defendant.
Define actus reus.
The physical act or omission that constitutes a crime
Actus reus must be proven for a successful prosecution.
What is the ‘but for’ test in causation?
A test to determine if the harm would not have occurred ‘but for’ the defendant’s actions
This establishes a direct link between the defendant’s conduct and the resulting harm.
What is mens rea?
The mental state or intention of the defendant at the time of committing an offence
Mens rea is crucial in determining the culpability of the defendant.
What constitutes assault?
Causing another person to apprehend immediate unlawful personal violence
Assault can occur without physical contact.
What is the difference between S20 GBH and S18 GBH?
The key difference lies in the intention behind the act.
What must be proven for a successful theft charge?
TA 1968 No dishonesty is D genuinely believes:
He has right to deprive the other of it
He has consent
Cannot discover owner of property by taking reasonable steps
Common law test:
What was D’s knowledge and believe of the facts?
Was D dishonest according to standards of ordinary people?
Each element must be demonstrated for a conviction.
What is aggravated burglary?
Committing a burglary while in possession of an aggravating article such as a weapon
This increases the severity of the offence due to the potential for violence.
What is the defence of self-defence? Explain both householder and non-householder defences.
o Non-householder (prosecution to disprove):
Use of force was necessary in circumstances as D believed
Use of force was reasonable in circumstances as D believed
o Householder:
D is a householder
Self-defence used whilst in or partly in a dwelling
D believed V was a trespasser
D’s use of force was necessary in circumstances as D believed
D’s use of force was not grossly disproportionate in circumstances as D believed
This defence justifies the use of force in protecting oneself or others.
What must D believe about V in a householder self-defence case?
D believed V was a trespasser
What rights does a suspect have at the police station?