Rf + b(Rm-Rf)
Rf= risk free rate
b= Levered beta
Rm= expected return on the market
The PV of the terminal value is the PV for far in the future earnings, and you need to incorporate near earnings as well. It is much more realistic to project FCFs within a period of 5-10 years, and much more uncertain beyond that time frame. Thus, EV needs to incorporate the PVs of near term and long term earnings.
Yes, a multiple of EBITDA to get EV is one way to get an implied valuation of a company. A DCF provides another perspective to reach EV.
Wait, why isn’t the PV of the terminal value just the company’s EV? Also, couldn’t you just use a multiple of EBITDA to get EV?
levered beta / ((1 + (1 - tax rate)) x (debt / equity value))
c) find the median value
d) re-lever the unlevered beta using the formula”
unlevered beta * (1 + ((1 - tax rate) x (debt / equity value)))
The above re-levering takes into account the company’s debt, equity, and tax rate.
Company A has a higher valuation. Money today is worth more than the same amount of money in the future.
You’re looking at two companies that have the same total projected FCF over a 5 year period. Company A generates 90% of its FCF in year 1, and 10% throughout the rest of the years. Company B generates FCF equally over the 5 years. Both have the same discount rate.
Which company has a higher value based on a DCF?
Terminal multiple and perpetuity method
What are the 2 methods to calculate terminal value?
If you were to receive $100 in perpetuity and wanting a 10% required rate of return, you would pay $1000. But, if that $100 were to grow by a fixed growth % each year, you would be willing to pay more for that. Thus, you take that same $100, but divide it by the WACC - Growth rate to get the value to pay if requiring a 10% return.
Explain the idea of the Gordon Growth model (utilized in perpetuity method).
Subtract value of debt, value of preferred stock, value of minority interest and add cash/equivalents. Then, divide by diluted shares outstanding.
How do you derive equity value/share when you’ve calculated enterprise value via a DCF?
Most professionals use book value of debt. However, it is important to adjust that if the market value of the debt is significantly different.
The cost of debt is a risk free rate (typically 10 or 30 year T-Bond) plus a spread to adjust for the company’s risk profile. If the company’s debt is publicly traded, you can directly observe the rate.
If the company’s debt is not publicly traded, I would examine the company’s footnotes looking for a rate, check for latest debt issuances, use a comparable company’s rate, or ask a debt markets professional
How do you get the value of debt?
How is the cost of debt derived? How do you derive it if the company’s debt is not publicly traded?
It applies a valuation multiple such as EV/EBITDA, to the final year’s forecasted metric. For example, a company could have a 8x EV/EBITDA multiple, which it would apply to the final year’s projected EBITDA.
The terminal value is discounted according to the final period FCF was projected.
It is important to use an EV multiple
What is the terminal multiple method?
10%
Calculate WACC
Risk Free rate 4%
Market risk premium 7%
Levered beta 1.3
Market value of debt $350
Market value of equity $650
Tax rate 35%
Cost of debt 6.6%
It more refelcts operating cash flow while including the impact of CapEx
$33
Calculate the equity value per share:
Assume the PV of FCF is $500 million. The PV of the terminal value is $3,000 million. Net debt is $200 million. Cost of equity is 11% and WACC is 9%. There are 100 million diluted shares outstanding.
On the other hand, if liabilities are increasing greater than assets, that means cash flow is INCREASING.
Your first period is .25, then second period would be 1.25 (.25 + 1 year). etc
Simply add depreciation and amortization to reach EBITDA.
In the terminal multiple method, how do you get EBITDA if you only have EBIT?
As an approximation, do you think it’s okay to use EBITDA - changes in OWC - CapEx
Company A
Who has the higher PV of the terminal value?
Assume that company A has a WACC of 10% and comapny B has a WACC of 8%. Both companies have a projected year 5 terminal EBITDA of $100 million, but company A’s exit multiple is 10x and company B’s is 8x.
The rate reflecting the years commensurate with the number of years projecting free cash flows.
(Rm-Rf) is the market risk premium, which is the premium investors expect for investing in non-risk free assets.
Beta shows the relative volatility of a stock compared to the market.
Which risk free rate should you use?
What is (Rm-Rf)?
What is beta?
We’re creating a DCF for a company that is planning to buy a factory for $100 cash in year 4. Currently, the NPV of the company is $200. How do we adjust the NPV to reflect the new CapEx spend?