Stark v Post Office.
Statutory obligations are often strict
Smith v Baker
Workers do not consent to risks
Caswell v Powell
Workers are unlikely to be found to be guilty of contributory negligence
Wheeler v New Merton Mill
No volenti in statuory cases
What is the duty in Hatton v Sutherland?
The “threshold question” in Hatton is: Was the worker reasonably foreseeably at risk of injury to health through stress?
This question is made up of two parts:
Melville v Home Office
An employer was found to be liable for stress at work from a prison officer who had seen several dead bodies of suicide victims
Lister v Hesley Hall
Intentional and even illegal acts can still result in vicarious liability
Rose v Plenty
Mikround case- vicarious liability found
Poland v Parr
The employer was liable for someone pushing a customer away to protect a stall
Warren v Henley’s
The employer was not liable for the employee punching a customer
Twine v Bean’s express
There was no vicarious liability to a hitchhiker who had been picked up
Hilton v Thomas Burton
Visiting a relative at the end of the day was “on a frolic”
Harvey v O’Dell
Getting lunch was not on a “frolic”
General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas
The duty to provide a safe system of work exists wherever the employee is working
Bux v Slough Metal
The employer must supervise the safe system of work
Century Instance v NI Road Transport Board
Doing an authorised act in an unauthorised way is in the course of employment
Ratcliffe v McConnell
Volenti applies in trespass cases. If the claimant is aware of the risk, then s1(6) of the Occupiers Liability Act will apply
Tomlinson v Congleton
The danger must be caused by the “state of the premises” or something that is done or should be done to them
What is the difference between Donogue v Folkstone Properties and Rhind v Astbury?
What is the rule in The Calgarth?
When you invite someone into your house to use the staircase, you don’t invite them to slide down the banisters