an extremely short duration pulse corresponds to an
infinitely wide range of frequency components, all having the same amplitude
diffraction is
the spreading of waves around obstacles
interference is most pronounced when
the wavelength of the light is comparable to the dimension of the obstacle it encounters
Fraunhofer diffraction
diffraction observed in the image plane of the source - eg at infinity
normally dealing with plane waves and small angles
interested in determining the diffraction pattern at a large distance from the aperture
Fresnel diffractions
diffraction observed close to the diffracting object
wavefront are significantly curved
complicated mathematical treatment
fraunhofer - assuming the diffraction beams are
esentially parallel when they leave a slit since assuming they create an image at infinity
fraunhofer - if a slit has width d then the path difference between the two beams originating from either end of the slit is
d sin theta
can genealise d sin theta to
oath difference between any two beams, whose origin points are separated by y have path difference
y sin theta
path difference has a linear dependence on y
for fresnel diffraction, assuming the
point of interest is relatively close to the slit
fresenl - difference in lengths of the two beams
δr = sqrt (r0^2+y^2) - r0
can assume y/r0 is small so we can use binomial expansion
path difference for near-field diffraction is
quadratic in y
experimentally, how to fraunhoder
use a converging lens to focus parallel rays
can’t physically observe at infinity
with respect to the path travelled by a Huygen’s wavelet originating at y=0, the path travelled by one originating at a distance y will be
-ysin(theta_y)
the relative phase will then be -yksin(theta y)
if we want to know what is happening at a point P far from the slit we can
add up all the contributions from across the slit that reach that point, which are characterised by the angle subtended at the middle of the slit
ie integrate
if we define the field as P at Ep then we can say that
Ep prop to integral between -a/2 and a/2 of
E0exp(-ikysin(thetay)) dy
E0 represents
the slit itself, which we assume is constant across the width of the slit
the sinc function represents the
diffracted amplitude which cannot be measured directly
diffracted irradiance can be measured
irradiance is proportional to the
square of the sinc function
I=I0[sin^2 B/B^2]
With some suitable maths – which I wouldn’t expect you to reproduce – it can be shown
that ψP, the value of ψ at a point P inside some closed surface S can be expressed as
an integral over that surface giving us the (Helmholtz) Kirchhoff Integral Theorem (KIT):
KIT - S is a
closed surface surrounding the point P where we want to find the field
KIT - in any given problem, we will choose a
sensible surface with an eye on making the integral easy to evaluate
we can use the KIT to
calculate the diffraction produced when plane waves illuminate an aperture Q
KIT - we choose our large, closed surface to include the diffracting aperture Q which we assume is
much larger than the wavelength of the illuminating light
KIT - P’ is
the source of our light, sufficiently far away that we can consider the waves from it to be plane-parallel waves when they reach Q