diffraction Flashcards

(57 cards)

1
Q

an extremely short duration pulse corresponds to an

A

infinitely wide range of frequency components, all having the same amplitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

diffraction is

A

the spreading of waves around obstacles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

interference is most pronounced when

A

the wavelength of the light is comparable to the dimension of the obstacle it encounters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fraunhofer diffraction

A

diffraction observed in the image plane of the source - eg at infinity

normally dealing with plane waves and small angles

interested in determining the diffraction pattern at a large distance from the aperture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fresnel diffractions

A

diffraction observed close to the diffracting object

wavefront are significantly curved

complicated mathematical treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

fraunhofer - assuming the diffraction beams are

A

esentially parallel when they leave a slit since assuming they create an image at infinity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

fraunhofer - if a slit has width d then the path difference between the two beams originating from either end of the slit is

A

d sin theta

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

can genealise d sin theta to

A

oath difference between any two beams, whose origin points are separated by y have path difference
y sin theta

path difference has a linear dependence on y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

for fresnel diffraction, assuming the

A

point of interest is relatively close to the slit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

fresenl - difference in lengths of the two beams

A

δr = sqrt (r0^2+y^2) - r0

can assume y/r0 is small so we can use binomial expansion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

path difference for near-field diffraction is

A

quadratic in y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

experimentally, how to fraunhoder

A

use a converging lens to focus parallel rays

can’t physically observe at infinity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

with respect to the path travelled by a Huygen’s wavelet originating at y=0, the path travelled by one originating at a distance y will be

A

-ysin(theta_y)

the relative phase will then be -yksin(theta y)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

if we want to know what is happening at a point P far from the slit we can

A

add up all the contributions from across the slit that reach that point, which are characterised by the angle subtended at the middle of the slit

ie integrate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

if we define the field as P at Ep then we can say that

A

Ep prop to integral between -a/2 and a/2 of
E0exp(-ikysin(thetay)) dy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

E0 represents

A

the slit itself, which we assume is constant across the width of the slit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

the sinc function represents the

A

diffracted amplitude which cannot be measured directly

diffracted irradiance can be measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

irradiance is proportional to the

A

square of the sinc function

I=I0[sin^2 B/B^2]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

With some suitable maths – which I wouldn’t expect you to reproduce – it can be shown
that ψP, the value of ψ at a point P inside some closed surface S can be expressed as

A

an integral over that surface giving us the (Helmholtz) Kirchhoff Integral Theorem (KIT):

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

KIT - S is a

A

closed surface surrounding the point P where we want to find the field

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

KIT - in any given problem, we will choose a

A

sensible surface with an eye on making the integral easy to evaluate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

we can use the KIT to

A

calculate the diffraction produced when plane waves illuminate an aperture Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

KIT - we choose our large, closed surface to include the diffracting aperture Q which we assume is

A

much larger than the wavelength of the illuminating light

24
Q

KIT - P’ is

A

the source of our light, sufficiently far away that we can consider the waves from it to be plane-parallel waves when they reach Q

25
KIT - dΣ is
the area element of the surface is a vecotr that points normal to the element and inwards
26
KIT - the gradient of the term in the square bracket is
resolved - by the scalar product - giving the component along the line joining the area element to the point P
27
KIT - the scalar product gives the
normal component of the spatial derivative of the field ie the component of the field derivative along the line joining the area element to the point P
28
KIT - we will let Ψ be
the (scalar) E-field of the light (there is a more complicated vector treatment to account for polarisation but beyond scope of this course)
29
KIT - r is the
distance from an area element on the closed surface to the point P where we want to calculate the field
30
KIT - we need to know
Ψ and ∇Ψ the magnitude of the filed and its gradient over the closed surface of integration
31
we will denote the field emerging from the aperture by
ΨQ this will be the field incident on the aperture, modified by any aperture function
32
aperture function
x1 if its a hole more complicated if the aperture was filled with something that affects the amplitude and/or phase of the transmitted light
33
KIT - to make the calculation simpler, we choose
the big surface enclosing P such that it is a large sphere centred on P also require that the aperture is part of this surface so there will be a bit of the surface linking sphere to aperture
34
first term of the KIT
∇[e^ikr /r] = [e^ikr /r][ik-1/r]n
35
first KIT term - we can say that kr>>1 because
we are calculating Fraunhofer diffraction so the distance from the aperture to any point P is much larger than the wavelength
36
first KIT term - n is
the unit vector along a line from the aperture to P need to think about its direction
37
the gradient of a function points in
the direction in which the function increases
38
our function e^ikr/r decreases as a distance from the aperture towards P increases so its gradient will
point back towards the aperture, along the line joining the aperture to P
39
kr>>1 so k>>1/r so ∇[e^ikr/r]=
ik e^ikr/r (-n)
40
the Fresnel-Kirchhoff diffraction formula captures the elements of the story that
simple Huygens wavelet picture missed 1. wavelength dependence 2. phase offset indicated by -i 3. the obliquity factor
41
obliquity factor
(n+n'/2) . dΣ ensures that waves from the aperture propagate in a forward direction
42
applying KIT to fraunhofer diffraction - for simplicity assume that
incident plane-wave illumination is on-axis ie k aligned with the normal to the aperture so optic axis is aligned with direction n
43
Fraunhofer diffraction involves large distances and small diffraction angles. So for any point P in the image plane we can say that the corresponding unit vector n is
close to being aligned with the optic axis n and n' can be considered very close to parallel so (n+n'/2) . dΣ = dΣ
44
We are interested in the separation because we want to know the
relative phase of a beam arriving at P from our area element with respect to a beam arriving there rom the origin of the optic axis that ahs travelled distance p p=sqrt(X^2+Y^2+L^2)
45
p
this term is independent of the position of the area element within the aperture we are considering
46
[xX/p +yY/p]
this term is the one that matters for Fraunhofer diffraction
47
[x^2/2p+y^2/2p]+...
these terms are negligibly small in the fraunhofer region since we are far from the aperture
48
In the Fraunhofer region, then, we have the path travelled by the contribution arriving at P due to our area element in the aperture as
r=p-[xX/p +yY/p] =p-[xθx +yθy] since θx=X/p and θy=Y/p
49
The diffraction pattern results from the
differing phases of the components arriving at P from all the area elements in the aperture. ie a constant additive phase (p term) is irrelevant so r=-[xθx +yθy]
50
If we assume plane parallel illumination that is constant over the aperture, we can replace ψQ by
a function A(x,y) this describes the form of the aperture in the x-y plane
51
at its simplest, A(x,y)=
1 where the aperture is 0 everywhere else
52
final Fruanhofer diffraction result is powerful because
**the integral is the 2D fourier transform of the aperture function**
53
It is conventional to express the 2D Fourier Transform of the aperture function A as a
function of angular spatial frequencies
54
In the diffraction pattern, at a distance ρ from the aperture, the “X” coordinate in the diffracted field (corresponding to a spatial frequency k X will be located at
X=pthetax = pkx/k and equivalently for the y-coord
55
Small spatial features correspond to
large spatial frequencies and so a big diffraction pattern
56
large spatial features correspond to
small spatial frequencies and negligible diffraction
57