Why is the psycodynamic approach in the middle of nature and nurture?
Its more interactionist: Acknowledges that biological, social and learning may all play a role.
What are the strengths of nurture and nature in the psychodynamic approach?
Adult personality is the product of innate drives (nature) and childhood experiences (nurture).
Explain the psychodynamic approach as to why it is more application?
Dream therapy is successful.
Application + usefulness strengths
How important childhood experiences are.
Why is the approach deterministic?
Weaknesses of determinism?
‘Psychic determinism’
Why is the pyschodynamic approach non scientific?
Not replicable, researcher bias in Bowlby and fruds studies so not objective.
Whats a weakness of the approach being not scientific?
Why is the approach more holistic than reductionist?
What are some holistic strengths of the approach?
Why is the approach mostly idiographic?