AO1/Description
AO1/Description- DSM IV
Uses the axis system to diagnose:
Axis 1: Clinical disorders
Axis 2: Personality disorders and mental ‘retardation’
Axis 3: Medical issues which might influence their illness
Axis 4: psychosocial and environmental factors affecting the person
Axis 5: Global Assessment of Functioning (1-100)
AO1/Description- DSM V
AO1/Description- ICD
AO3- Goldstein (1988)
found that 169 of the 199 patients diagnosed according to DSM-II as having some form of schizophrenia met the DSM-III criteria too, so reliability was seen as good with the DSM. Of the patients assessed by the clinical experts as well, she found high levels of inter-rater reliability.
AO3- Kirk and Kutchins (1992)
In a review paper, Kirk and Kutchins argued that methodological problems with studies conducted to test the reliability of the DSM up until 1992 had limited the generalisability of their findings. For example, they argued that there had been insufficient training and supervision of interviewers, and studies tended to take place in specialised research settings, and so could lack validity as well as reliability.
AO3- Jakobsen et al (2005)
completed a random sample of Danish patients with schizophrenia. An ICD-10 diagnosis showed 93% sensitivity and 87% predictive value when diagnosing schizophrenia
AO3- Lee (2006)
ADHD in Korea Lee looked for concurrent validity by comparing the DSM-IV-TR criteria with criteria arising from the questionnaire, and compared DSM behavioural and psychological characteristics with those found in an ADHD test.
AO3- Ford & Widiger
males and females diagnosed differently with same symptoms- lowers validity (doctor bias)
AO3- Rosenhan
shows DSM reliable
shows patients lying can fool DSM lowering validity
AO3- Updated
improves validity
may hinder the reliability of the diagnosis
AO3- Useful
entitles people to medical help etc
AO3- Standardised symptoms-
improves reliability
Differ from each other in some cases