environmental justice
to treat all fairly and involvedly for environmental law and policy implementation
to address the disproportionate suffering of minorities as a result of environmental impacts
what is the EJ gap
the difference in exposure to enviro hazards across income and demographics
how to measure EJ gap
calculate average exposure among one community type, and compare it with average exposure in another community type
complications in measuring EJ gap
the ecological fallacy
the relationship estimated from aggregated data is only equal to the relationship at the micro level if there are no group-level effects correlated with pollution.
are there group level effects and how do they affect results when measured in diff geographic units
banzhaf, ma, and timmins
they hypothesize these factors dictate EJ gap:
- discriminatory politics and enforcement
- household sorting ‘coming to the nuisance’
- disproportionate siting on the firm side
- market coordinations
cushing findings
meng and hernandez cortez
spatially, californian areas that are disadvantaged also have highest pollution exposure driven by cap and trade program
overall effect of cap and trade on EJ
costs and benefits of decarbonization with EJ
benefits
- climate change mitigated helps all
-reduce GHG and health damages for some communities
costs
- local employment effect from carbon intensive industries
-increase in energy costs
-reduction in local tax revenues
easing decarbonization transition