. Why shouldn’t they try for higher wages?
Rhetorical question; directed at an audience who realises the value of workers as forming the backbone of the war effort
uses comparative adjective to stress the disparity between rich and poor: imitates his father’s motto
‘well, I was in that state when a chap easily turns nasty – and I threatened to make a row.’
euphemistic language-
men abuse their priviledge to practice their basal desires
dynamic adverb ‘easily’ suggests fluency between ‘states’ thus implying that upper class men don’t commit themselves to posterity
creates a paradox between the image of wealth and the truth behind it which suggests the injustice of capitalism
‘you’re not the kind of father a chap could go to when he’s in trouble’
euphemistic language- sense of shame and oppression is inherited from older-generation
perhaps symbolic of war guilt being passed on from WW1 and acting as a catalyst for WW2
Priestley presents capitalism as a neglectful parent - the ‘father(land)’ was used to describe fascist Italy. Disparaging the right-wing method of government (parenting)