Paragraph 1 statement?
STRONG AGREEMENT:
State should exist to protect law and create order
Paragraph 2 statement?
STRONG DISAGREEMENT
The state has a paternalistic role
Paragraph 3 statement?
AGREEMENT
The size of the state
Paragraph 1 state existence and law and order
FIRST TALK ABOUT…
NR -> Rand + Nozick -> state must protect law and order.
ON agree it keeps society together and happy.
Paragraph 1 state existence and law and order
NEXT TALK ABOUT…
Traditional like Hobbes agree social contract, other Traditional like Burke disagree (no contracting in - born into it). HOWEVER, they still agree that law and order is needed by the state to govern the nation.
Paragraph 2
paternalistic view of the state
FIRST TALK ABOUT…
Trad -> Burke -> Natural aristocracy (by virtue of privileged birth, some more able to act in national interest as trustees not delegates)
ALTHOUGH ALSO AGREES…
Middle Way -> MacMillan -> state should be paternalistic to promote economic growth and lift people out of poverty whilst respecting property rights.
Paragraph 2
paternalistic view of the state
NEXT TALK ABOUT…
HOWEVER,
NR -> Neo Libs like Rand and Nozick -> state exists to protect people from coercion -> paternalism violates their liberty eg. Welfare state dependency culture.
So shows disagreement overall
Paragraph 3
State size
FIRST TALK ABOUT…
Neo Lib -> Rand and Nozick -> nightwatchman minimal state no promoting traditional values.
ALTHOUGH DISAGREE…
Neo Cons strong state to enforce law and order and promote traditional values
Paragraph 3
State size
NEXT TALK ABOUT…
HOWEVER, THEY MOSTLY AGREE AS:
Both Neo Con and Neo Lib both agree with the rolling back of state frontiers to free up efficient hand of market and revitalise society.