What is the study of ethics
study of) the standards for what are the ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ things do.
What is the basis for your own ethical decisions?
a) I consider my duties as a responsible agent and consider the rights of those affected by my actions.
b) I weigh the positive and negative outcomes of my actions and try to do as much good as possible.
Ethical frameworks
2
Deontological ethics
Consequentialist ethics
In practise, ethical standards reflect both deontological, thinking and consequentialist considerations
Deontological ethics
duty-’ or ‘rights-based’ ethics. Actions are considered ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ depending on whether they are consistent with the ‘duties’ of the agent and the ‘rights’ of those affected by the actions.
Consequentialist ethics
outcome-based’ ethics. Actions are considered ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ following the ‘weighing’ of their positive and negative outcomes. Example: utilitarianism, aiming to achieve maximal happiness for the greatest number.
Which psychologist is associated with deontological ethics?
Immanuel Kant
1724-1804
Which psychologist is associated with consequentialist ethics?
Jeremy Bentham
1748-1832
Some ethical challenges for scientists/psychologists
•Research conduct - Subjects (humans & animals) - Data collection, handling and publication - Conflicts of interest •Public relations •Application of psychological knowledge
Who are the research ‘subjects’ in psychology
Humans
Animals
Research involving human participants
•Guiding principles:
Autonomy and protection of the human participant
Research involving human participants
Historical milestones:
-Nuremberg Code, Nuremberg military tribunal 1947 – especial emphasis on informed consent
-Declaration of Helsinki, World Medical Association 1963 (last revision 2013) – based on Nuremberg Code, relaxation of the requirement for informed consent
Most recent version: World Medical Association, 2013, JAMA 310(20):2191-2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
•Nowadays regulated by law of the land and professional codes of conduct
What do you think does the ethical code of the BPS require concerning research involving human participants?
a) Incentives (e.g., payment) to take part.
b) Harm to participants must be avoided.
c) Informed consent whenever possible.
d) Participants should not be personally acquainted with researcher.
BPS ethical principles for research with human participants
Respect for autonomy and dignity of participants
➢Harm to participants must be avoided and all risks carefully assessed
➢Informed consent
➢Debriefing
Research involving animals
What do you think is the current situation concerning animal research in UK?
There are strict legal regulations concerning research on animals.
Research involving animals
•Guiding principles:
Research involving animals
Strict legal regulation:
Data collection, data handling and publication biases:
Falsification or ‘cooking’ research data
Failing to present data that contradicts ones own previous research
Publishing the same data or results in two or more publications
Inappropriately assigning authorship credit
Data collection, data handling, publication: some guidel
•Take pleasure in your research and in finding things out!
Take pride in and responsibility for any research you are involved in!
Conflict of interest
Any situation in which financial or personal considerations have potential to compromise scientific or professional conduct.
Examples:
Researcher may financially benefit from specific research outcome.
Peer-reviewer wants to get research funded/published that is very similar to the one he/she assesses.
Peer-reviewer has personal relation to author or applicant.
Examiner has personal relation to examinee.
Declarations of conflicts of interest
Conflicts of interest are common. To minimize any negative impact, such conflicts should always be carefully considered and be dealt with openly.
Many academic journals and funding agencies require a ‘declaration of commercial/financial conflicts of interest’ from authors, applicants for funding, and peer reviewers.
Public relations
•Research is largely funded by the public, and researchers should strive to give the interested public access to research.
So, please go out and talk about your studies and research to members of the public!!!
•Problem: scientific knowledge is not easily accessible for lay persons, and there is huge potential for misunderstanding!
Misrepresentation of the outcomes of a dissertation project
Researchers not only have the responsibility to make their research accessible to the public, but must also take care that the research is not misrepresented!