Supporting Evidence
-Bartlett’s war of the ghosts shows that what we remembers is governed by schemas. Supports Reconstructive memory theory, as it proves that memory is not a completely accurate record of what happened
Conflicting Evidence
-Research by Yuille and Cutshall. They asked participants about a real life shooting to do a study about eyewitness testimony = they found that 5 months later the memory of participants was nearly entirely accurate
-Bartletts war of the ghosts lacked generalisability and ecological validity
Other exaplantions
-Flash bulb memory = describes the vivid and detailed memory of an event which was intense
Usefulness
-Proves useful in real life situations such as proving eye-witness testimony’s are not as reliable as they seem
Testability
-Easily tested by reading a story and reproducing it, like war of the ghosts
Simplicity
-Findings can be quite simplistic due to him only using theories of schemas, not taking in consideration factors like emotions or biological factors.