Logical Relevance?
Same thing.
Legal Relevancy Exclusion?
Probative vs. prejudicial balancing test
Prop. 8 - Victim’s Bill of Rights
Criminal Trials Only - All relevant evidence is admissible subject to few exemptions.
Prop 8. - Victim’s Bill of Rights Exceptions?
DR Mammal Counts SHEEP
* D opens door to character
* Rape shield laws (victim’s character)
* Member of media (confidential sources)
* Court can still balances probative vs. prejudicial and exclude
* Secondary evidence rule
* Hearsay
* Exclusionary rules based on US Constitution
* Exclusionary rules by CA after 1982
* Privileges existing in 1982
Public Policy Exceptions - Subsequent Remedial Measures?
Not allowed except:
* Ownership and control
* Rebut infeasibility
* Other party destroyed evidence
Public Policy Exceptions - Liability Insurance?
Not allowed except:
* Onwership and control
* Impeachment
* Admission
Public Policy Exceptions - Offers medical expenses?
Not allowed except:
* FRE: Admission
* CEC: None
Public Policy Exceptions - Settlement Offer?
Not allowed except:
* Disputed claim/settlement
* CEC: also applies to mediation
Public Policy Exceptions - Offers to Plead?
Not allowed except:
* Cal - Prop 8 allows.
Public Policy Exceptions - Expression of Sympathy?
Not allowed except:
* Admission of fault
Witness Testimony Requirement?
Personal knowledge.
Objection to Form Grounds?
NU CALF
* Narrative
* Unresponsive
* Compound
* Argumentative
* Leading
* Facts not in evidence
Present Recollection Refreshed?
Lay Opinion Testimony?
Based on personal knowledge; not scientific or specialized knowledge
Expert Opinion Testimony?
FRE - Daubert Expert Test?
CEC - Frye Test
Attorney-Client Privilege?
Doctor-Patient Privilege?
Psychotherapist- Patient Privilege?
FRE and CEC have for confidential communications.
Marital Adverse Testimony (Spousal Immunity)
Marital Confidential Communication?
Four CEC Only Privileges?
Three Types of Character Evidence?