Evidence - RELEVANCE
Evidence having any tendency to make the existence of a fact of consequence to determination of the action more or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
Evidence - FORM OF QUESTION OBJECTIONS
Evidence - NON-RESPONSIVE
W does not answer the question or goes beyond its scope.
Non-responsive portion(s) are subject to a motion to strike
Evidence - CHARACTER EVIDENCE
The use of prior conduct to infer a character trait and then the use of that trait to suggest later conduct in conformity with it.
Evidence - Character - SEXUAL MISCONDUCT EXCEPTIONS
CRIM: In sexual assault cases (or CA elder/dependent/child abuse or DV cases), PBAs of sexual assault are admissible to prove character of sexual predation.
CIVIL: In FED ONLY civil cases for claims based on sexual assault or child molestation, PBAs of sexual assault or child molestation are admissible to prove conduct.
Evidence - NON-CHARACTER PURPOSES
Evidence - MERCY RULE
In CRIM cases, ∆ may first offer opinion or reputation evidence of his relevant good character trait.
Prosecution may then:
Evidence - VICTIM CHARACTER EVIDENCE
FRE:
CEC:
Evidence - RAPE SHIELD LAW
In all CRIM and in CA civil cases, character evidence of a sexual assault V is inadmissible to prove consent UNLESS it is:
1) prior sexual conduct with ∆ or
2) a CA civil claim for loss of consortium
Evidence - HABIT and CUSTOM
The regular practice of responding to a specific situation with specific conduct
Admissible to show that, on a particular occasion, a person/entity conducted him/itself in conformity with the habit/custom.
Evidence - SIMILAR OCCURRENCES
1) Must be used to prove some relevant proposition other than character
2) Circumstances must be substantially similar to the occurrence at issue.
Evidence - POLICY EXCLUSION LIST
1) Subsequent Remedial Measures
2) Offers of Compromise
3) Offers to Pay Medical Expenses
4) Benevolent Gestures
5) Liability Insurance
6) Plea Offers/Withdrawn Pleas
Evidence - SUBSEQUENT REMEDIAL MEASURES
FRE: inadmissible to prove negligence, culpable conduct, or product defect
CEC: inadmissible to prove negligence or carelessness
Evidence - OFFER OF COMPROMISE
CIVIL ONLY
Evidence - OFFERS TO PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES
FRE: only offer itself is inadmissible
CEC: offers, humanitarian gestures, and connected admissions are ALL inadmissible to prove fault
Evidence - BENEVOLENT GESTURES
CEC ONLY
Only gesture itself, not any admissions in connection, will be excluded
Evidence - LIABILITY INSURANCE
Inadmissible to prove negligence or other wrongdoing
Evidence - PLEA OFFERS/WITHDRAWN PLEAS
FRE: inadmissible if made to prosecuting atty only
CEC: inadmissible if made to prosecutor OR non-transporting law enforcement as part of bona fide plea negotiations
Evidence - PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENT
Can be proven extrinsically ONLY if W is given an opportunity to explain or deny them OR hasn’t been excused.
FRE: always admissible to impeach; only admissible for truth if made under oath
CEC: always admissible for both
Evidence - W IMPEACHMENT BY CONVICTION/PBA
FRE:
CEC:
Evidence - AUTHENTICATION
The proponent of a writing/thing/voice must prove sufficient evidence for a judge to find that it is what it purports to be.
Self-Authentication:
FRE: notarized docs, newspapers, trade labels, certified copies of public records, official publications of public authorities, commercial paper
CEC: only certified copies of public records
Evidence - BEST or SECONDARY EVIDENCE RULE
BER (FRE): The contents of a writing must be proved by an original, which includes duplicates
SER (CEC): To prove the contents of a writing, the Code expresses a preference for copies
Evidence - HEARSAY
An out of court statement used to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
Evidence - NON-HEARSAY PURPOSES
1) Why a particular course of action is taken
2) Alive or otherwise conscious
3) Verbal acts
4) Effect on hearer/reader
5) Mens rea
6) Notice
7) Circumstantial evidence of declarant’s state of mind