EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HYPOTHESIS AND A THEORY
hypothesis:
* a tentative explanation of a phenomenon that can be tested and may be accepted or rejected
theory:
* explanation of an observation that is supported by facts, models and laws
CONTRIBUTION OF VARIOUS SOURCES OF VARIATION
CRRRM
MEIOSIS:
* crossing over involving the exchange of genetic material during prophase 1 leads to the formation of gametes with different gene combinations
* the random assortment of homologous chromosome pairs on the equator during metaphase 1 also leads to greater variation
REPRODUCTION:
* random fertilisation where different gene combinations are formed which increases variation in species
* random mating of individuals and successful fertilisation occur in a population, the variety of gene combinations formed is even greater
MUTATIONS:
* changes in sequence of nucleotides may lead to change in the amino acid sequence of protein synthesised
CONTINUOUS VARIATION
DISCONTINUOUS VARIATION
IDEAS ON EVOLUTION IN ORDER OF ORIGIN
THEORY OF LAMARCK
LAW OF THE INHERITANCE OF ACQUIRED CHARACTERISTICS:
* characteristics developed during the life of an individual can be passed on to their offspring
LAW OF USE AND DISUSE:
* as an organism uses a structure or organ more regularly, it becomes better developed or enlarged. if an organism does not use a structure or organ frequently, it becomes less developed or reduced in size and may disapear altogether
REASONS FOR LAMARCK’S THEORY BEING REJECTED
DARWIN’S THEORY OF EVOLUTION OBY NATURAL SELECTION
PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM
DEFINITION OF BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION
DEFINITION:
1. POPULATION
2. SPECIES
PROCESS OF SPECIATION
SPECIATION THROUGH GEOGRAPHICAL ISOLATION IN THE FOLLOWING
EXAMPLES OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION THAT KEEPS SPECIES SEPERATE
EXAMPLES OF NATURAL SELECTION AND EVOLUTION IN PRESENT TIME
HOW BACTERIA DEVELOPS RESISTANCE TO ANTIBIOTICS
PHYLOGENETIC TREE OF THE FAMILY HOMINIDAE IN THE ANIMAL KINGDOM
PHYLOGENETIC TREE OF THE FAMILY HOMINIDAE IN THE ANIMAL KINGDOM
file:///C:/Users/sagem/Dropbox/PC/Downloads/Photo%20(4).pdf
CHARACTERISTICS THAT HUMANS SHARE WITH AFRICAN APES
ANATOMICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AFRICAN APES AND HUMANS
BIPEDALISM:
* humans - foramen magnum in a forward position. more curved spine. short-wide pelvis
* african apes - foramen magnum in a backward position. less curved spine. long, narrow pelvis
BRAIN SIZE:
* humans - large frontal area, which requires a large cranium and a higher forehead to house and protect it.
* african apes - smaller brain, less developed
TEETH (DENTITION):
* humans - small teeth. canine is smaller. no gaps between incissors and canines.
* african apes - large teeth. large canines. gaps between incisors and canines
PROGNATHISM:
* humans - shorter jaw. does not need strong muscles for their diet of softer foods. face is small and flatter in the front.
* african apes - longer jaw. stonger muscles required for their diet of tough foods. face is large and protruding in the front.
PALATE SHAPE:
* humans - palate is small and semi-circular in shape
* african apes - palate is long and rectangular in shape
CRANIAL RIDGES:
* humans - no cranial ridge as humans have smaller jaws and do not need large jaw muscles
* african apes - cranial ridge across the top of the cranium
BROW RIDGES:
* humans - not well developed. more upright brow, which holds a larger brain
* african apes - brow ridges well developed
FOSSIL EVIDENCE
FOSSIL : ARDIPITHECUS
anatomical features:
* brain size: 300-350 ml
* forward position of foramen magnum
* protruding jaws
* heavy brow ridges
* pelvis structure: bipedal and tree climbing
FOSSIL : AUSTRALOPITHECUS AFARENSIS (LUCY)
anatomical features:
* brain size: 375-550 ml
* forward position of foramen magnum
* bipedal
* protruding jaws
* heavy brow ridges
* canines large and pointed