What is the evolutionary explanation of partner preferences
According to evolutionary psychology partner preferences are driven by SEXUAL SELECTION. Both males and females choose partners that maximise their chances of reproductive success. Individuals with traits that maximise reproductive success (strength, height, wide hips etc) are more likely to survive and pass on the genes responsible for their success.
Why do males and females select their partners differently?
Male gametes (sperm cells) can be reproduced quickly with little energy expenditure. Female gametes (eggs/ova) are much less plentiful and require energy to produce. This DIFFERENCE(anisogamy) IN REPRODUCTION means that males and females use different strategies to select a partner. Generally males use intra sexual selection and females use inter sexual selection.
Intersexual selection
Inter-sexual selection is where members of one sex (usually female) choose from available prospective mates (usually males)
Anisogamy suggests that a women’s best evolutionary strategy is being selective when choosing a partner. Females will tend to seek out males with characteristics that will suggest they are able to provide for their children (physical health, high status and resources). Although this ability may have equates d to muscular strength in our evolutionary past in modern society it is more likely to to relate to occupation, social class and wealth.
Intra sexual selection
This is where members of one sex (usually male) compete with one another for access to the other sex. This leads to male female DIMORPHISM which is an accentuation of secondary sexual characteristics in those with greater reproductive fitness.
Anisogamy suggests that a males best strategy is to have as many partners as possible. Males must compete with other males to present themselves as the most attractive mate to fertile female partners.
Males might engage in male guarding preventing the female partner from mating with someone else. Males are apparently very fearful of having to raise another man’s child.
Strengths of evolutionary exploration of partner preference
Weaknesses of evolutionary explanation