The Iron Horse, Early Industrialization and the Transformation of Urban Space
Otis Opened Elevator Factory September 20, 1853
By 1896, Ford had constructed his first horseless carriage
New York Stock Market Opened on Wall Street January 4, 1865
The transcontinental railroad was completed in 1869.
The telegraph (invented by Samuel F. B. Morse in 1844), and the railroad, knit together the regions
From 1850 to 1890 the total population in the United States increases from 23 million to 63 million
The urban population increases 18% (from 14% to 32%) or 16.6 million people
Many of the new industrial technologies had specific locational requirements we get:
What was Grand Rapids, Michigan nicknamed and what was it?
“The Furniture City.”
It was the first center of mass-produced furniture in North America
What contributed to the makings of a continental urban system?
Why was the growth of the rail network important?
What were some effects of the continental urban system?
Where did most early industrial growth (and consequently urban growth) occur during the early phases of industrialization occur?
The largest existing towns and cities.
By 1875 the urban system had 15 cities that had more than 100,000 people. Why?
Explain on the urban hierarchy the forces of diversification vs forces of unification.
As population/complexity increases, the probability of finding all the stuff available in one location decreases
What is the Rank-Size Rule?
Pi = P1÷ Ri
Pi = population of city i Ri = rank of city i P1 = population of the largest city in the urban system
For example:
How did rank sizes change and grow prior to industrialization, during the industrial era, and then after?
Prior to industrialization we saw that it was possible to have a number of urban gateways of similar size
During the industrial era we find that the rank size distribution is more likely to converge on a straight line
By 1870 the spatial pattern of urban places becomes more predictable in the United States
Why did Continental Urbanism succeed and what were some of its effects?
How does the urban system develop (what are the 5 phases)?
A “Stage Model”
Phase 1: Exploration
Phase 2: Harvesting of Natural Resources
Phase 3: Farm-based Staple Production
Phase 4: Establishment of Interior Depot Centers
Phase 5: Economic maturity, central place infill.
Describe phase 1 of the stage model
Describe phase 2 of the stage model
Describe phase 3 of the stage model
Describe phase 4 of the stage model
-Penetration of the interior (usually along routes that facilitate movement of staple products)
-Development of long distance routes and the emergence of towns serving as depots of staple collection at strategic locations
-Towns are established at strategic locations to function as “depots of staple collection” (spearheads of the frontier)
Urban industrial growth in the mother country – supplies both home and colonial markets
Describe phase 5 of the stage model
Vance’s staple trade interpretation is useful for long-run urban development in colonial American, but it is not entirely satisfactory in explaining the initial colonization of English towns. What came first in most English colonial settlements in the new world?
For English colonial settlements, if the staple trade didn’t solely determine urban locations – what did? Why build a town first?
We also cannot ignore the influence of mercantilism on the development of the urban system. How do you define mercantilism?
Basis principles of Mercantilism:
What did mercantlism have a hand in?
What did the influence of colonial companies (monopolist authority) do to towns and their location?
Why did Boston, Charles Town, Philadelphia succeed beyond expectations and Jameston, St. Mary’s and Burlington flounder?
Vance’s model would have us look at the economic base of a staple export commodity
But we might also consider immigration issues
1630s Puritans to Boston
1680s English Quakers to Pennsylvania
1680s Barbadian planters, French Huguenots, English nonconformists
These periods and places are characterized by family migration (middling socioeconomic status)
Population spikes often corresponded to mother country economic depression and religious persecution