1. Benjamin Order (Re Benjamin [1902])
- If a beneficiary cannot be traced, the executor can apply to the High Court for a Benjamin order.
- This allows the executor to distribute the estate as if the missing beneficiary were dead.
- If the beneficiary later reappears, they cannot sue the executor personally — they must claim from whoever received the distribution.
2. Trustee Act 1925, s.27 Notices
- Executors should still publish statutory notices (London Gazette + local newspaper).
- This protects them against unknown claimants, but on its own is not enough if the beneficiary is known but missing.
- However, it still demonstrates “reasonable steps” were taken.
3. Reasonable searches
Executors must take reasonable steps to trace the missing person, e.g.:
- Genealogical searches / probate researchers
- Enquiries with relatives, banks, or the DWP
- Advertising in newspapers
- If they have made reasonable efforts but still cannot find the beneficiary, the court is more likely to grant protection (Benjamin order or otherwise).
4. Indemnities from beneficiaries
- Executors can ask the other beneficiaries to give indemnities before distribution.
- This way, if the missing person later comes forward, the loss falls on the other beneficiaries (not the executor).
5. Missing Beneficiary Insurance
- A common practical solution is to take out missing beneficiary indemnity insurance.
- The estate pays a premium so that if a beneficiary later appears, the insurer covers the claim.
- This is especially useful when a court order seems disproportionate for a small estate.
In summary
If a beneficiary is known but untraceable, an executor is protected if they:
- Make reasonable efforts to trace them,
- Consider a Benjamin order (to treat them as deceased),
- Place s.27 notices to cover unknown claimants,
- Use indemnities or missing beneficiary insurance to shift risk away from themselves.
This ensures the executor won’t be personally liable if the missing heir turns up after distribution.