exp Flashcards

(12 cards)

1
Q

george sperling exp (3)

A
  • duration & capacity of sensory memory
  • all 9 letters stored in memory for a short period of time BUT only 4-5 could be recalled (iconic memory)
  • could recall all 12 but time taken for verbal recount would cause them to disappear from memory
  • tone to cue which row they had to recall
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

john watson exp (3)

A
  • behaviourism, “little albert”
  • child conditioned to fear rat by pairing it w/ loud, frightening sound
  • began to fear the rat & other similar objects showing STIMULUS GENERALISATION
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

edward tolman exp (3)

A
  • latent learning, cognitive maps w/ rats
  • learning can occur w/o immediate reinforcement, challenges behaviourism (learn to navigate maze)
  • develop mental map/internal rep off environ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Albert bandura exp (

A
  • social cognition “bobo doll
  • learning can occur latently, rewards is what displays it
  • observing model is how we learn, motivation causes behaviour to be reprod
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

atkinson & shiffrins exp (5)

A

digit span task
1. digits VERBALLY presented
2. must recall in EXACT order
3. seq length would ^ until upper limit reached
* avg adult span 7+/- 2 items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

brown & peterson ex (3) + results (3)

A

AIM: measure decay of STM overtime
1. recall 3 consonants
2. memory probed @ 3s retention intervals (had to count backwards in 3s from a given # - distractor)
after 3 s interval - 50% recalled
after 9 s interval - 20%
after 12-18 s interval - 0%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

baddleys working model desc (3)

A
  1. STM: CE, VSS, PL, EB
  2. LTM: visual semantics, lang, episodic LTM
    3.active, multi component system for reasoning & prob solv (NOT PASSIVE MAINTENANCE OF INFO)
    explains dual-task performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

holway & boring exp (4)

A
  • Investigating Depth Cues
  • Observers sat @ intersection of 2 corridors & could view a test circle in 1 corridor & comparison circle in another
  • Task: adjust the size of the comparison circle to match the test circle
  • Differing depth cues were progressively removed in different conditions. (Binocular disparity, Motion parallax, Shadows etc.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

desc ames room (2)

A
  • Size illusions.
  • specially designed room created to be viewed through a peephole that made the room appear to be normal so that when 2 participants stood in corners of the room, they would appear to be much larger/smaller than in reality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

desc Suchow & Alvarez exp (3)

A
  • Motion induced change-blindness.
  • circle of colourful dots that change colour
  • As the circle rotates, the colour-changes becomes difficult to notice, providing evidence for motion induced change-blindness as a result of transient signals associated with all observed objects which disrupts preferential attention, so changes go unnoticed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Carassco et al exp (3)

A
  • Attention and Contrast
  • Observers were req to the report the orientation of the higher contrast grating even when both gratings were identical in contrast.
  • When observers were cued to a certain grating, that grating appeared higher in contrast.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Treisman & Schmidt exp

A
  • Illusory Conjunctions
  • When character strings are presented briefly followed by a noise mask, observers are then asked to report coloured letters
  • frequently associated w/ the wrong colour due to the inhibition of Feature Integration theory.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly