Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing
2 Components of FEES training
Our code of ethics: “engage only in those practices that are within our scope of competence.” (If we are not competent we shouldn’t be doing it)
MD vs SLP
Time of Endoscopy
2. We can stay in the nose while the patient eats their entire meal- can watch for fatigue
Pros of Endoscopy (5)
Repeat endoscopy exams can be done more easily and with less hesitation than fluoroscopy because they:
*** Can perform more than 1 time in a day if you need to.
Five components of FEES
Indications for a FEES exam (9)
Do FEES when patient demonstrates: (5)
FEES limitation
Indications for Fluoroscopy (7)
Risks of Endoscopy/Contraindications (9)
** = have medical help present or don’t do FEES
Adverse Reactions- (7)
Study of 6000 exams – 73 examiners
a. 20/6000 (.3%) epistaxis- bloody nose
b. 2/6000 (.03) fainted
c. 2/6000 (.03) laryngospasm
Universal precautions (3)
Endoscopic equipment (6)
Positioning
FEES Procedure (7)
What to look for during FEES (11)
Use of food dye- 7
Protocol (5)
b. base of the tongue and pharyngeal
structures(at rest and in motion)
c. laryngeal structures (at rest & in motion)
2. For all movements, note:
a. Symmetry
b. Range of movement
c. Agility/Briskness of movement
d. Precision/timing/coordination
3. Delivery of food and liquid
4. When abnormal swallowing behaviors are identified – the examiner generates hypotheses about their cause and then tests the hypotheses by asking the patient to perform tasks
a. Premature spillage, chin tuck, ask them to hold (anterior bolus hold), try teaching a supraglottic swallow to close the larynx or the mendelsohn to clear the pyriform swallow
5. Make appropriate therapeutic recommendations.
0 Normal (moist)
1 Pooling outside of laryngeal vestibule anytime during observation
2 Pooling in laryngeal vestibule transiently, spills in over the observation period or patient clears them at some point
3 Pooling in laryngeal vestibule consistently. There continuously and patient does not clear them.
3.
a. 100% of pts. rating a 2 or a 3 aspirated food or liquid
b. 53% of pts. rating a 1 aspirated food or liquid
c. Ratings of 2 or 3 high risk for aspiration
Rating of 1 considered at risk
See secretions- usually indicates that they won’t be very successful at eating safely
Ice Chip Protocol
If patient demonstrates a great deal of secretions and they cannot be cleared either spontaneously or through cued swallows, consider an ice chip protocol.
If the bolus spills into the pharynx, what path does it take? (4)
5 pt. Ashford Scale
How adequate are structural movements during swallow?
2. Valving forces