As a starting point, where should we consider filing a trade mark?
1) Where it is visible to a consumer (retail or franchise outlets)
2) Sourcing and manufacturing countries (e.g., to stop counterfeits)
3) Transit points (e.g., to stop counterfeits)
4) IP abuse hotspots (where common IP issues around)
How do you decide what type of mark to file, especially if there are figurative elements in the mark?
1) Budget - can the client afford more than one mark? Do they have a logo and word mark, or just one or the other?
2) Colour or black and white? Depends what aspects of the mark are important.
3) Should they file a word or logo or both? Think about genuine use problems going forwards. If they are likely to keep the name but change the logo or branding, it may be preferable to prioritise the word mark.
What non-traditional mark considerations should be considered?
Primarily packaging or 3-D marks, depending on if they have a unique way of packaging the product or there are shapes involved.
Can also consider, smells, sound, holograms etc if they are vital for the business, but be wary of absolute ground objections.
What less important filing strategy points should we consider?
What timeline considerations are there for when you should register a mark?
1) Budget - can we space it out?
2) Non-use and use based jurisdictions. How long is the non-use period e.g., in China it is three years. Also, do we need use to get a more enforceable registration e.g., in the US? Discuss with local attorneys.
3) Paris convention deadline - priority period
4) Evergreening considerations - are we going to be invalidated for bad faith?
5) How long will it take to get a registration? Canada currently numerous years. Faster in the UK. Discuss how long it will be until they launch.
Five benefits of a Madrid registration?
1) Centralised so only requires one application.
2) Generally cheaper when designating more than a few countries.
3) Objections apply country to country, rather than in the EU where the whole thing can be refused
4) Fewer formalities e.g., PoA
5) Provides a bundle of rights which makes it easier to assign
Five cons of a Madrid registration?
1) Centralised attack wipes out all designations and is expensive to convert to nationals
2) Some countries, especially in Africa, are included in Madrid protocol but is not fully implemented
3) Home registration requirements – watch out for “real and effective industrial or commercial
establishment
4) Sub-classification system in some countries can mean gaps in protection (e.g. China).
5) Can make licence recordal more difficult, e.g. for China
Which important countries are not part of the Madrid protocol?
South Africa: One of the most significant economies not part of the system.
Hong Kong SAR: A major financial hub not covered by the designation of China.
Nigeria: A major African economy.
Taiwan: Registered independently of China.
Saudi Arabia: A significant missing member of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).
Kuwait: Another significant GCC country not in the system.
Argentina: A major South American market not in the system.
Macau SAR: Separate jurisdiction from China.
What considerations should you have when filing a Madrid protocol?
Should you file single or multi-class when filing?
What is a defensive registration?
Which important territories are not covered by an EUTM?
Advantages of filing an EUTM?
Cover 27 countries in one application – v cost effective.
* Can claim seniority from earlier national registrations to reduce renewal costs.
* Can maintain registration with use in only part of the EU (so avoiding non-use attacks in
other part of EU).
* No restrictions on applicant.
* Only examined on absolute grounds.
* No opposition on bad faith.
* EU wide injunctions available and EU Customs measures
Disadvantages of filing an EUTM?
An objection in any one country can mean whole application fails (though can convert).
* Expensive as a base for a Madrid registration and more difficult now for UK companies
* Slower than UK to registration.
* If a non-distinctive or descriptive mark then demonstrating acquired distinctiveness is more
challenging as need to show use in all countries where the objection is valid.
* The EU Office can notify earlier EUTM owners as part of its searc
Advantages of filing national registrations?
Standalone trade marks unaffected by refusals or issues in other jurisdictions.
* Can be very quick to register.
* Rarely any ownership requirements.
* Specification can be easily tailored.
* Local language registration certificate.
* All options available under the national registration system.
* Simple…
Disadvantages of filing national registrations?
Expensive if covering more than a few countries.
* Use requirement can not be avoided.
* Administratively more difficult e.g., multiple renewals and deadlines
* Sometimes fees are chargeable per item in specification