Cotext
text which comes before or after utterance
Circumstances of utterance
-physical circumstances in which expression is uttered
exophor
expression whose full understanding requires knowledge of the setting in which they are uttered (your and my)
content
-meaning of utterance when it is filled out by a suitable knowledge of the setting in which it is used
Endophora
-dependence- third person personal pronoun
-endophor/ proform- words exhibiting this dependence
“He was driving it today”
-demonstrative, “one”, it, he/she/they, “the bastard”, “so”, “there”, “such”
-Can be any constituent, antecedent can be anything,
-Most common- third person pronoun
Ellipsis
-dependence
-“Ed a porsche”
=Not a full constituent
-Varies with what preceding clause presents
-Fails to convey a proposition unless in the presence of another constituent
Antecedent
-relevant portion of the cotext necessary for full understanding
Gapping
-Ellipsis
- two constituents, neither of which is a constituent of the other
-correspond to first and final constituents of sentence before
“Peter saw the movie and susan ___ the play”
Interrogative ellipses
-Ellipses
-Antecedent entire clause,
-Ellipses for interrogative constituent, standing for ind clause
“Ed bought a mercedes”
“Where ____”
Verb phrase ellipses
Copular complement ellipses
-ellipses
-verb to be in context
“Bill is fond of cheese and mary is ____ too”
Appended coordination
Nominal ellipses
Antecedent noun phrase, defective expression is one containing constituent that is a sister to the noun
“Colleen ate two large cookies and evan ate three”
Ambiguity
use of alternate truth value judgement to determine ambiguity relies on fixed state of affairs and fixed setting, while use of alternate truth judgement to determine exophora relies on a change in setting and cotext
Implicature
- enrichment which is obtained on the basis of utterances literal meaning as well as beliefs about maxims
Entailment
Cooperation
- one should make ones contribution such as is required, by the accepted purpose or direction of the conversation
Quality
- One should have adequate evidence for what one says, should not say what one believes is false
Quantity
-Maxim, One should contribute as much information as is required for purpose of conversation
Relevance
-ones remarks should be relevant
Manner
-One should be perspicuous- brief orderly, clear, unambiguous
Non-conventionality
Non-detachability
- Ex. sarcastic “bill is genius” same implicature as sarcastic “bill is mental prodigy”
Derivability
-Implicatures Can by characterized by form of reasoning