What is Police responsibility and approach to risk? RCB
R>Level of RISK
C>Actual/perceived CONSEQUENCES
B>BEHAVIOUR/Attitude and capability of FA holders
RISK>Magnitude of what may happen and Likelihood that it will happen
What is Police 4 aims for managing risk - behaviours for FLC No holders?
> For those who WANT TO COMPLY - MAKE IT EASY
For those TRYING TO COMPLY - ASSIST
-For those who are RELUCTANT TO COMPLY - ENCOURAGE
-For those those WILFULLY NOT COMPLYING - FULL FORCE of REGS
What is the priority?
Getting COMPLIANCE outcomes rather than enforcement action for EVERY tech breach
What do Police consider when deciding on interventions ABCR
What are the possible interventions?
What are the factors to consider when deciding on intervention tool? RAPC
What are the parameters for basis of belief that a breach to the AA.83 has occurred?
REASONABLE BELIEF that FA lic holder - -is failing -failed -likely to fail to comply with any of the prov of AA.83 based on "BALANCE OF PROB"
What are the aims to new purpose of fit and proper to possess F/A or Airguns?
- impose controls on the poss and use of FA and other wpns
What is the two-stage process to assess fit and proper?
1- whether holder involved in offending/behaviours and scenarios defined in s24A(1) or 24A(2)
2- whether the severity and recency, individually or collectively, - one may be enough…
Outline how we look at s24A(1) and s24A(2)
For s24A(1) 1 or more (a) - (n) conv/chargs/multiple legisl, FV Temp po/FV grounds for po/rest order/ment and phys illness of injury/gang or org crime aff/alc & dr abuse/hate crimes -NOT LIMITED to s24A(1) and may look at
>s24(2) -
1) KNOWLEDGE of safe poss and use of FA
2) U/STANDS legal obl of a FA holder incl endsmts
3) any other under 74(1)(bc)
-any other considerations we feel appropriate
THEN WE LOOK AT
whether the severity and recency, individually or collectively, - one may be enough…