FPTP definition
plurality electoral system most votes in a constinuency win
‘winner takes all’
FPTP is dis
proportional
Advantages of FPTP
strong stable government-often produces single party majority govs
clear link between MP and constinuency- one MP- accountability
Decisive outcomes- avoids coalition bargaining
simple and easy to understand system
It produces clear results, with a single winner in each constituency- loser’s consent so transitions of power are smoother
keeps extreme parties out
coalition less likely
Disadvantages of FPTP and examples
disproportional results- lots of votes few seats e.g reform 2024 election -14% votes 3rd in vote share 4 million votes but only 5 seats, less than 1% of seats
2024 election- Labour 33% one of the most disproportionate results in UK hisory- considering voter turnout was at 60% in reality were only voted in by 1 in 5 of the population.-majority of 411/650 seats in parliament 63% 10 million votes - lack of legitimacy
,
a party can win a majority of seats in Parliament with less than a majority of the popular vote.
It can discourage third parties from standing in elections, as they have little chance of winning seats under FPTP
wasted votes- votes for losing candidates or surplus votes in safe seats
unfair -to smaller parties- minority representation
electoral bias- system favours larger parties torys/labour
low turnout in safe seats- lack of voter choice
Two-Party System
Since 1974, every Prime Minister has been either a Conservative or a Labour leader.
29% of seats have not changed hands since 1945
FPTP tends to prodce a —– party system
two
the winner gets far more seats than they would in a proportionate system
called the:
winner’s bonus