Foresight Group Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

Why foresight group?

A

Foresight Group’s reputation as an industry leader in renewable energy and energy transition investing, is a huge draw. Being part of a highly regarded firm and team means you will be learning from and working with really talented people, being lead by great leaders, having access to best in class training and resources and as someone in the developmental stage in my career this is extremely important.
I also really like that it would involve working in a sector that is pivotal in shaping the future of our planet and offers the chance to make a tangible difference in relation to climate change and in promoting sustainable development which I think would be highly rewarding.

Lastly, I would say from what I have heard from Jackson and Sarah, and our first interview its a very fun social culture, where everyone gets on with eachother and enjoys eachothers companys which is similair to what I had at KPMG, and while you dont have to get along or be friends with everyone you work it certainly makes it a lot easier to come to work on monday when you do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why this role?

A

In terms of this role specifically I am drawn to the diverse and innovative investment portfolio at Foresight Group, within the infrastructure portfolio there’s renewable energy so solar ,wind, Hydro, geothermal, theres energy from waste and biomass energy, waste management and recyclimg facilities, water and wastewater treatment, energy storage, and supporting infrastcuture for all these and so lots of different asset types and I believe that this variety will provide a dynamic and stimulating work environment where I can continuously learn and grow.

One of the key things I am looking for in a new role is a level of specificity so as to develop some expertise in an area, but enough variety and variability so as to not get bored. I think that role provides that as there is that overarching theme of renewable energy and climate transition but enough variability within that and doing those other tasks like asset level optimisations and advice on disposals etc.

I also really like that foresight group has operations and investments all through the UK, Europe and in Australia, this offers opportunities to work on international projects, and so getting experience in global markets and really helping me to develop global perspective, which has someone coming from a very small country in New Zealand is one of the things im searching for in moving to London.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is covered under the infrastructure team

A
  1. Renewable Energy Projects:
    o Solar Power: Ownership and operation of solar farms that generate electricity from solar panels.
    o Wind Power: Investment in both onshore and offshore wind farms that harness wind energy to produce electricity.
    o Hydropower: Investments in small-scale hydroelectric projects that convert flowing water into renewable energy.
  2. Energy from Waste:
    o Anaerobic Digestion Plants: Facilities that process organic waste to produce biogas, which can be used for electricity generation or as a renewable vehicle fuel.
    o Waste-to-Energy Plants: Plants that convert various forms of waste into electricity or heat through combustion or other processes.
  3. Biomass Energy:
    o Biomass Power Plants: Facilities that produce energy through the combustion of organic materials such as wood pellets and agricultural residues.
  4. Waste Management and Recycling Facilities:
    o Recycling Plants: Facilities aimed at processing and recovering valuable materials from waste, contributing to the circular economy.
    o Landfill Gas to Energy Projects: Projects that capture methane gas emitted from landfills and use it to produce electricity.
  5. Water and Wastewater Treatment:
    o Treatment Plants: Facilities designed to treat and manage water and wastewater, ensuring clean water supply and environmental protection.
  6. Energy Efficiency Projects:
    o District Heating Systems: Networks that provide heating to multiple buildings from a centralised source, improving energy efficiency.
    o Energy Storage Systems: Investments in battery and other energy storage technologies that help balance supply and demand in the energy g
  7. Supporting infrastructure for renewable energy assets: e.g MaresConnect a proposed 750MW electricity interconnector linking the power markets of Ireland and Great Britain. The cable route is approximately 245km in length and will run underground and under the sea between Dublin in Ireland and Bodelwyddan, Denbighshire in Wales
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Key recent transactions and events:

A

Transactions: - FEIP 1 made a 267 MW solar portfolio investment in Greece.
- Foreseight Environmental Infrastructure sold 51% of a portfolio of anaerobic digestion assets for 68.1m. Turning waste into Biogas.
- FEIP invested into Silvermines a Pumped storage Hydro project in Ireland in FY24

Other recent information: Foresight Environmental Infrastructure Limited announced the write down of its investment in HH2E AG (“HH2E”), which targeted the development of several green hydrogen production sites across Germany due to a lack of third party funding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why a valuations role over M&A or corporate development?

A

I think what draws me to valuations especially this role over M&A or corporate development is the clarity and objectivity of the work. There is a greater focus understand true value to inform investment decisions, which is more analytical and precise compared to the fast-paced, deal-driven environment of M&A especially on the sell-side .

I think sometimes in M&A you trying to backsolve work to get to the answer you know the seller wants as opposed to objectivley valuing the business or assets.

At KPMG, I worked on a live transaction where our responsibility was limited to the financial model. We weren’t involved in the broader deal administration which was handled by our M&A team, and I found that really suited me. I enjoyed focusing on the numbers and the model, but even with that we built the model and produced the valuation analysis and basically weren’t coming up with a number that was high enough and so had to revisit assumptions and forecastst and try and reverse engineer a higher value. And so I like that in this role there is that objectivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Compare different valuation methodologies?

A
  1. Trading Multiples (Comparable Companies Analysis):
    What it is: Valuation based on market multiples of similar publicly traded companies (e.g., EV/EBITDA, P/E).
    Pros: Quick, market-based, and easy to apply.
    Cons: May be influenced by market distortions, lacks company-specific insights.
  2. Transaction Multiples (Precedent Transaction Analysis):
    What it is: Valuation based on multiples from past M&A transactions of similar companies.
    Pros: Reflects actual deal prices and strategic premiums.
    Cons: Limited by historical data, may not reflect current market conditions.
  3. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF):
    What it is: Values a company based on its projected future cash flows, discounted to the present using a required rate of return.
    Pros: Focuses on intrinsic value and long-term cash generation.
    Cons: Sensitive to assumptions about future performance and difficult to estimate accurately.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why are you looking for a new role, and why specifically are you looking to this business?

A

Mainly I am looking for a lifestyle switch, I am keen to move away from NZ see what the world has to offer do some more travelling, new scenery, I have been in NZ my whole life so just need something new.

Key thing I am looking for in my next role is a level of specificity so as to gain some real expertise in a subject matter or nail a skill set, but also enough variety and variability so as to not get bored. I think role provides this with the sector focus of general sustainabie infrastcuture and solutions but also enough variety within in that in terms of the asset types but also those asset level optimisations and assistance in asset disposals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Key differences and when to use each?

A

Trading Multiples: Best for a quick, market-based valuation of a company or for companies with public peers in similar industries.
Transaction Multiples: Ideal when assessing the value of a company in the context of potential M&A transactions, especially if there are premium considerations or synergies., as trading multiples do not reflect these
DCF: Most useful for understanding the intrinsic value of a company based on its own

Trading and transaction multiples are market-based and easier to apply but don’t capture long-term potential.
DCF provides a deeper, intrinsic valuation but requires accurate future forecasts and is sensitive to assumptions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Key financial metrics in renewable energy valuations and what is LCOE?

A

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV), Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR), and Payback Period.
What is LCOE (levelized lost of energy?)
LCOE is calculated by dividing the total costs of a project (including upfront costs, operating costs, and maintenance) by the total amount of electricity generated over the project’s lifetime.

LCOE is calculated by dividing the total costs of a project (including upfront costs, operating costs, and maintenance) by the total amount of electricity generated over the project’s lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the primary risks you consider when valuing a renewable energy project, and how do you quantify them?

A
  • Expected answer: Risks include regulatory risk, technology risk, market risk (energy price volatility), financing risk, operational risk, and weather/energy production risk. These risks can be quantified through sensitivity analysis or adjusting discount rates to reflect risk premiums.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How do you account for the variability in energy production when valuing a renewable energy asset?

A
  • Expected answer: You would consider the capacity factor (which measures the actual output versus the theoretical maximum) and incorporate energy production forecasts based on historical data, weather patterns, and regulatory factors.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the key influences on capacity factors?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the key government incentives and policies that impact value?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Notable news and transactions 2025

A

Great British Energy Act May 2025, The Act provides GBE with an initial funding allocation of £8.3 billion over the course of the current Parliament. This capital is intended to support the development and deployment of renewable energy projects, including wind, solar, and emerging technologies like hydrogen and carbon capture .

Additionally, the government aims to attract private investment to co-finance these initiatives, signaling a commitment to a low-carbon future and energy independence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the rationale behind having listed and unlisted vehicles?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the relationship between levered and unlevered IRR with regard to a DCF

A

Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
Definition: FCFF is the cash flow generated by the operations of a company before accounting for interest payments (debt) and includes capital expenditures and working capital changes. It represents the cash flow available to all investors (both equity and debt holders).
Use for Unlevered IRR: Unlevered IRR uses FCFF because it measures the return on the total capital invested in the project without considering the financing structure. It reflects the project’s performance purely based on operating cash flows.

Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
Definition: FCFE is the cash flow available to equity shareholders after accounting for debt servicing (interest and principal payments) and any changes in the firm’s net borrowing. It represents the cash flow that can be distributed to the equity holders.
Use for Levered IRR: Levered IRR uses FCFE because it measures the return on the equity portion of the investment, reflecting the impact of leverage. It considers how debt financing affects the cash flows available to equity investors.

17
Q

What are the challenges of using IRR

A
  1. Multiple IRRs: Projects with unconventional cash flows (i.e., alternating between positive and negative) can have multiple IRRs, making it confusing and difficult to determine a clear decision.
  2. Assumes Reinvestment at IRR: IRR assumes that intermediate cash flows are reinvested at the same rate as the IRR, which might not be realistic. Other methods like the Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR) address this issue by assuming reinvestment at the project’s cost of capital.
  3. Doesn’t Account for Project Size: IRR does not consider the scale of the project. A smaller project with a higher IRR might be chosen over a larger project with a slightly lower IRR despite the latter potentially creating more overall value.
  4. Timing of Cash Flows: IRR is insensitive to the timing of cash flows. Two projects with identical IRRs but different timing of cash flows can have very different risk profiles.
  5. Assumes a Single Time Period: IRR is best suited for evaluating the performance of investments over a single time period. For investments with multiple phases or different investment horizons, using IRR can be misleading.
  6. Comparing Projects with Different Durations: When comparing projects of different durations, IRR can lead to incorrect conclusions. The measure does not easily account for varying project lifetimes, which could affect the comparability of the investments.
  7. Neglects Scale of Returns: IRR focuses on the percentage rate of return rather than the absolute dollar amount of returns. This might lead to selecting a project with a higher percentage return but smaller overall profit.
18
Q

Key relevant modelling experience?

A

Project jade - M&A model build, NZRC - valuation model build DCF, trading and transaction comps, NZFL - lessor interest DCF models for various plots of land including forestry and carbon price path modelling, recent valuation review of Ranui solar projects - DCF and assumptions check (LRMC energy, energy mix, Orio Group secondment - Carbon model build

19
Q

Company and infra key financials:

A

Infra key financials: 295 UK assets, 97 EU assets, 45 AUS assets, 10.1b AUM, 44.7m revenue, 16.9m EBITDA

20
Q

Walk through a DCF

A

1.Forecast the free cashflows, EBIT(1-T) + D&A - Capex - NWC change. 2. Estimate the terminal value using either an exit multiple or a TGR. 3. Determine an appropriate WACC and discount the FCFs. Sum FCF to calculate EV ( if using FCFF) then for equity value subtract net debt.

21
Q

Questions for them?

A
  1. Do you guys provide any transactional support?
  2. “analysis to support asset level optimisations” what would this involve?
  3. What is the team structure and culture?
  4. There a lot of different assets, how are these divided up among the team?
  5. With the quarterly valuations do they start to become a bit routine and mundane or do you still find it engaging and interesting every time you do a recurring valuation?
  6. What does my first 6, 12, months look like, whats the process of getting me up to speed? Then also what will success look like at each of those stages?
  7. Like with reccurring valuations every quarter is the same person doing the analysis every quarter or do you rotate so its fresh eyes and I know reviews are big part of the job can you talk about what those review processes or tasks are?
  8. You mentioned in the last interview about the hydrogen project in Germany that these assets are just held at book value, for your development projects you have models and valuations set up for them but you hold them at book value of WIP until operational, or like when does usually change for you guys?
22
Q

Explain the different contract types for electricity?

23
Q

How would you build a model for a solar farm?

A
  1. Project assumptions
    2.Revenue assumptions
  2. Capex
  3. Opex
  4. Financing assumptions
  5. CF forecasts
  6. Sensitivity / scenario
  7. DCF valuation
24
Q

What are the cheapest and most expensive sources of energy and why?

25
Typical modelling assumptions and ball park figures?
26
Compare a project finance model to standard DCF in terms of structure, cashflows, Debt treatment and usage, WACC, valuation focus
27
Talk about your experience reviewing models
We did a lot of model review work, as part of the corporate finance team we did a lot of audit support work where you are reviewing valuations, PPAs, Impairment testing (often a DCF), Valuations that Audit clients had done themselves or had had done by other advisors. Recently I did a valuation review of a collection of solar assets. Reviewing the DCF models for mechanical accuracy and the underlying inputs. So the key input was the electricity price path, where they followed forward prices for the first four years then estimated the LRMC to produce electricity, which was done by estimating the LRMC for each generation source and then estimating a generation mix for each year, we assessed reasonableness for these inputs and checked the accuracy of the calculation. We also did model reviews as an advisory engagement, mostly using our model review tool, which looks at the number of unique formulas in a model and you then check and comment on each unique formula.
28
How is revenue earned through grid services?
29
Talk about your experience project managing or managing someone at a lower level.
Most of my work over the ~ 3 years I was the most junior person on everything I worked on, but towards the end there were projects that there was a graduate working under me as the analyst. NZRC valuation the second year I had a graduate working with me that I managed, delagating work - sections of analysis and specific slides in the report, also providing support where needed too.
30
Describe the work on project jade and the valuation methods?
* Built financial for a self-storage company in the property sector * Included 14 sites each of which had its own worksheet. Each site was modelled as a P&L down EBITDA and site-level fixed assets. * Each site is then consolidated at the group level, with the cashflow being done at group level too. * The model has development projects built in. Each project had a specific number of units and date at which it will come online. Functionality was built in to turn projects on/off, move the opening date and change the number of units. * Valuation methods include DCF per site and a direct capitalisation method. * DC method is based on assumption about stabilised occupancy and pricing and then an assumption on the cap rate. Any forecast capex is also PV’ed and subtracted. If not at stabilised occupancy rate at valuation date, then the difference between stabilised EBITDA and forecast EBITDA is PV’ed and subtracted until the date at which stabilised occupancy is reached. * DCF is standard DCF, with working capital only done at the group level and only included in HDO.
31
Talk about the NZRC valuations
* Valuation model included a DCF, comparable company analysis and comparable transactions analysis. * DCF model was 10 years with functionality to switch between an exit multiple and a terminal growth rate for the terminal value calculation * Take Managements cashflow assumptions (do some due diligence and questions but we mainly want management to own these), apply working capital assumptions, our own WACC estimate and estimate terminal value using GG and exit multiple. Also applied normalisations to the terminal year as it was a BIL year. * Trading comps and transaction comps were mainly sports teams and other entertainment companies, focusing on companies that most of their revenue is contracted. - * Key difference in 2023 vs 2024 were that the forecasts given in 2023 were the same as those given to bidders. Silverlake then took these and added overlays to come up with their 3.5B EV value. We never saw these and so just based on the forecasts alone we were quite far off that. Used calibration to entry multiple as the primary method then 2024 had new forecast and relied more on the DCF.
32
Talk through the Orion carbon model experience
* The group has 7 CGU’s that were each modelled separately and then consolidated at the group level. * The model was built to track and forecast carbon emissions, operating expenditure and capital expenditure from key emission sources. * This included motor vehicles, generators, heavy trucks as well as other head office related sources (business travel, work commuting, head office building emissions, etc). * Model outputs included group and CGU level dashboards - Main challenges being collecting / cleaning the data, not having any template of what the model should be as hadn't really been done before
33
Talk through NZFL
* Lessor interest valuation model build for 21 land parcels including dairy farms, orchards and forests. * Model was a 50-year DCF model based on the contracted lease terms of each land parcel. * For the dairy farm and orchards assets, and the end of the lease period, a terminal value was calculated based on an assumed land value growth rate. * For the forestry assets at the conclusion of the lease period the forest would then be assumed to sell carbon credits that it had accumulated. This required a carbon price input which was a separate piece of modelling based on NZU forward prices, and an assumed carbon market international linkage in 2031 proxied by the carbon floor prices from the Dutch and Canadian emission trading schemes.
34
Where do you see yourself in 5 years?
Hopefully having nailed down a role and a skill set and really developed some expertise in an area, I would love for it to be renewable energy and energy transition valuations. I'd also like to have developed mroe managerial skills and have become a great mentor to younger colleagues. ideally still in London I have my initial 3-year visa and then I hope to obtain sponsorship to stay
35
What are important skills in being a good mentor / manager?
Communication I think is the biggest, every experience I've had being managed by seniors has hinged on how good a communicator they are, I like to know what is expected of me and when it is expected of me and so. Also how you do it is key, communicating in a way to encourage juniors to ask questions without feeling stupid and making yourself approachable. I always liked post meeting or discussions recieving written instructions in email form. Regular check ins but not over the top making juniors feel comfortable that you trust them I think helps, and over checking stresses people out, but obviously making sure progress is being made and offering opportunities for help or questions, so a good balance is key.
36
What are your main strengths and weaknesses?
Strengths are that I am a problem solver I back my self to be able to figure most things out, I can work well independantly and in a group, I am hardworking and motivated but also easy going and easy to get on with. Weaknesses - I would say I am a good problem solver but sometimes because I know that I just assume I can figure everything out by myself when it would just been easier and more efficient to ask someone. Presentations are also something that I've never found easy and I really have to work at it, I'm not someone that can just chuck a couple slides together and let the words come to me, I need to be prepared and know what I am going say.
37
Key differences between Sponsors, corporates and strategic investors?
Sponsors: Financial investors (e.g., private equity and infrastructure funds) focused on returns and eventual exit, using LP-backed capital, prioritising IRR/MOIC over operational synergies. Corporates: Operating companies investing with their own balance sheet to achieve industrial or operational synergies, typically holding assets long-term with no exit requirement. Strategic Investors: Investors (including corporates and strategic sovereign wealth funds) driven by long‑term strategic objectives such as market position, technology access, or supply‑chain control, where strategic value outweighs pure financial return.