what behvaioural deficits are observed in the FTD p3015 mutated MAPT model shown in 2012 MWM study.
This study investigated the impact on MVM training in 2012.
They reported cognitive deficots in spatial learning and memory.
motor abnormalities such as clasping when raised by te tails and limb weakness.
This could be applied also to deficts in AD
briefly decribe the FTD-ALS spectrum in terms of symptoms and common underlying genetic causes?
Growing evidence suggests that FTD and ALS may be 2 extremes of a sepctrum of disease. This stems from the heavy role of C9orf72 mutations in both diseases and in the cause of FTD-MND patients. Ths is primary linked to TDP-43 patholgy. This pathology can be seen in motor areas in dominantly FTD patients.
In terms of symptoms 50% of ALS pateints present with some behavioural abnormality and a subset will develop the behvaioural vairant of FTD. (5%)
This can be linked further to overlaps in pathology, With TDP-43 inclusions being a primary pathogenic factor in ALS whislt also contibuing to around 50% of FTD cases. In addition, alsthough rare in both diseases, inclusions of Fusion in sarcoma (FUS) intarcellular inclusion can be seen in both diseases.]
This suggests a underlying overlap in the aetiology of each disease.
What are the main clinical presentations of FTD? briefly expalin them
FTD patients present with 2 distinct phentypes.
Behvioural variant- defined by changes in personality and deterioration of emotions and Social conduct.
Progressive aphasia FTD- this is linked to issues of speech and is defined by 2 variants.
The variations can be linked t the unique ASSYMETRIC atrophy seen in FTD and the sights of atrophy.
BV- observe deterioration in the fronto-insular cortex (linked to sense of ones emotios and self) and Anterior cortex (linked to output of emotions and emotional control.
-degen is paritcuarlly revalent in the right hemispehere where the ACC acts as part of the SALIENCE circuit of emotions with links to emotional areas like the hypothalamuds, amygdala. these are dgeenerated early on. hence, explaining behavioural and emotional phenotype.
How might assymetric degeneration in FTD explain variations in clinical presentations?
The variations can be linked t the unique ASSYMETRIC atrophy seen in FTD and the sights of atrophy.
BV- observe deterioration in the fronto-insular cortex (linked to sense of ones emotios and self) and Anterior cortex (linked to output of emotions and emotional control.
-degen is paritcuarlly revalent in the right hemispehere where the ACC acts as part of the SALIENCE circuit of emotions with links to emotional areas like the hypothalamuds, amygdala. these are dgeenerated early on. hence, explaining behavioural and emotional phenotype.
How can FTD be distinguished from AD?
A basic and unaccurate split is that FTD is a form of early onset dementia whislt AD is primarily late onset.
Better are:
Symptoms- FTD patients tend to have mainatined cognition early on only displaying mild memory deficits
-AD patients tend to have maintained empotional repsonses.
Marker- CSF samples can be applied to look for AD markers like Amyloid beta 40/42
How can FTD be distinguished from Psychological disorders?
Pyschological diseases
These can be distinguished use MRI, phentoypic copies of FTD will NOT have Atrophy.
What are the 3 key pathologies in FTD? outline them?
Tau pathology:
Studies performed in Neural stem cells have implicated MAPT muations in dysfunction endocytic trafficking.
TDP-43 this is responsible for 50% of cases and is the most common pathology in ALS.
-Note- work in drosophilla has reported: LOF of TDP-43 has been related to motor abnormalities in larvae and decreased boutons at NMJ. Over expression of human trangene in drosophila also led to reduced boutons and dendritic branchhing. So both linked to toxic dysfcuntion of synaptic trasnmission that cause neurodegenration. Synaptic dysfunction is one of he early pathologies of ALS. skewed to wards LOF as theyre removed from fucntional location.
Ling et al 2015- Showed that CRE=ER controlled KO of TDP-43 led to loss of splicing of cryptic EXONs tat led to disrupted MRNA translation and the formation of several abberant porteins in mouse embryonic stem cell. Restoring splicing of these expns was able to prevent cell death in these lines.,
there are 4 subtypes distingyuishable by the layers of depostion and the forms of inclusios involved.
1- this primay effects layers 1 and 2 and has an abundance of cytoplasmic neuronal nclusoi=ion and SHORT neurotic tangles. (primary related to BV and NF Phenotype and C90rf72 and GRN mutations)
2- This effects all layers and consists of mainly cytoplasmic inclusions. (Best linked with bv PHENOTYPE and FTD-MND, thus C9orF72)
3- This effects predomiantly the first 2 layers involving LONG neurotic tangles. (This is est associated with the Semantic phentoype)
4- this unquiely has Nuclear inclusions and it related to the IBMPFD (Inclusion Body Myopathy early onset Paget Disease FTD)seen in rare VCP mutations.
In a smaller 5-10% of cases Tau and TDP pathology is rarer.
FET-FTD- this is related to dysfucntion in a family of proteins
UPS- Ubiqutin protein system can also be dysfucntional. This isvery rare and identiffied in the rare muatations of CHMP2B. This protein in related to the activity of the multivesicular body. Staining here commonl shows TDP-43 and FUS inclusions.
How can tau depostion been used to vary between diseases sharing tau pathology?
We can look at the wetsern blot identified bands expressed, and look at the location of depostion.
For example signs of Astrocyte plaques are a hall mark of Cortical basal DegenerATion asocciated to 4R tau.
FTD is 30% fammilial and 70% sporadic, outline the 3 main genetic mutations? link to disese mechanism
MAPT- microtubule associated protein TAU.
Progranulin (GRN)
C9orF72- this is the core link between FTD and ALS, being a large genetic contributor in both cases.
The are 3 mechanisms by which they believe this could be toxic.
-LOF th natural function is unkown but losing this could be toxic.
*KD studies have shown that this will inhibit the INDUCTION of autophagy that correlated with increased P62 AND TDP inclusions. pottentially a link to increased TDP.
*Ideas arre supported by SHI et al (2018) that show in patient derived and Crispr/CAS9 KO IPSC there is reduced endocytosis and vesicular trafficking.
*However= in CRISPR.CAS9 KO MOUSE MODELS, non precipitate the disease (ALS or FTD) suggesting that the haploinsuffieiciency alone does not cause the,.
ALthough, it could still contriute to excaerbate the condition through idsrupted lysomal fucntion e.t.c.
MIZIELINSKA et al 2014
-Support from study in FTD studies in drosophilla.
-expressed pure RNA and RNA-only forms in models. They showed via FISH that both could form RNA foci, but in IMMUNOBLOTTING they showed Pure RNA ALONE could cause DPRs.
-Using eye degeneration as a marker of neurodegen> Those soley expressing GGGGCC repeat expanded RNA (no protein) did not cause neurodegen. Whilst models only expressing pure RNA did cause degeneration suggeststing dipeptide repeats mediates toxicity.
- To see what was the cause of this they expressed a PROTEIN ONLY model differentiating between 2 codons in the REPEATS the sample those RICH IN ARGININE poly GLYCINE-ARGININES AND PROLINE ARGININES VS poly Glycine and proline alanines. They showed those
ARGININE RICH REPEATS DPRs alone caused increased eye degeneration.
Hence the arginine rich DPRs would seem to be the cause of C9orF72 neurotoxicity.
However, in posrt-mortem study the pattern of TDP pathology much btter tracks neruodegenration and is NOT common seen with DPR inclusios.
Given the links of DPRs to neruodegen in mouse models, it is likely DPR acts upstream fo TDP expalining its better correlation with DEGEN in psot-mortem studies which tend to represent end stages of the disease.
However, Knockin mouse models of C9orf72do not show TDP iclusions. despite observing motor, Cognitive defects with degeneration.
The downstream effects of C9orF72 DPRs have been implicated partiucuarly in issues with Nucleocytoplasmic transport.
Name 3 rarer muations seen in FTD?
CHMP2B- this is associated with FTD-UPS. muattions where identified in a danish family with autosomal dominant FTD.
VCP- This protein is involved in Protein homeostaiss and muation of its loci on Chromosome9 have been associated with FTD. inm particular the type 4 variant of TDP-43 linked FTD (IMBPFD)
- There is a large overlap here with other diseas. 1 being body myopathy which is a autosomal dominat disease conferring muscle weakness. 32% of these patients develop FTD with language and behvaioural dysfunction.
Ritson et al 2010, showed that expressing disease mutant forms of VCP ectopically led to photreceptor degen in drosophilla. This was enhanced by co expressing wild type TDP-43 and decreased by KD of TDP. links to ideas that issues with [proteoostasis cause toxicity linked to reduced breakdown of TDP=43 aggregates.
TARDBP- this is the TDP-43 GENE, recently the first case of a TDP-43 muation in FTD without MND was found. Before this TDP-43 muattions had been linked to sporadic cases of C90rf72 and GRN miutations.
What is the potential links between TDP-43 and C90rF72 DPR pathology?
C9orF72 exmapnsions are primary seen with TDP-43 inclusions in FTD and ALS.
However, in posrt-mortem study the pattern of TDP pathology much btter tracks neruodegenration and is NOT common seen with DPR inclusios.
Given the links of DPRs to neruodegen in mouse models, it is likely DPR acts upstream fo TDP expalining its better correlation with DEGEN in psot-mortem studies which tend to represent end stages of the disease.
Outline the characterisitic of C9orF72 repeats
C9orF72- this is the core link between FTD and ALS, being a large genetic contributor in both cases.
The are 3 mechanisms by which they believe this could be toxic.
-LOF th natural function is unkown but losing this could be toxic.
*KD studies have shown that this will inhibit the INDUCTION of autophagy that correlated with increased P62 AND TDP inclusions. pottentially a link to increased TDP.
*Ideas arre supported by SHI et al (2018) that show in patient derived and Crispr/CAS9 KO IPSC there is reduced endocytosis and vesicular trafficking.
*However= in CRISPR.CAS9 KO MOUSE MODELS, non precipitate the disease (ALS or FTD) suggesting that the haploinsuffieiciency alone cause the disease
ALthough, it could still contriute to excaerbate the condition through idsrupted lysomal fucntion e.t.c.
MIZIELINSKA et al 2014
-Support from study in FTD studies in drosophilla.
-expressed pure RNA and RNA-only forms in models. They showed via FISH that both could form RNA foci, but in IMMUNOBLOTTING they showed Pure RNA ALONE could cause DPRs.
-Using eye degeneration as a marker of neurodegen> Those soley expressing GGGGCC repeat expanded RNA (no protein) did not cause neurodegen. Whilst models only expressing pure RNA did cause degeneration suggeststing dipeptide repeats mediates toxicity.
- To see what was the cause of this they expressed a PROTEIN ONLY model differentiating between 2 codons in the REPEATS the sample those RICH IN ARGININE poly GLYCINE-ARGININES AND PROLINE ARGININES VS poly Glycine and proline alanines. They showed those
ARGININE RICH REPEATS DPRs alone caused increased eye degeneration.
Hence the arginine rich DPRs would seem to be the cause of C9orF72 neurotoxicity.
However, in posrt-mortem study the pattern of TDP pathology much btter tracks neruodegenration and is NOT common seen with DPR inclusios.
Given the links of DPRs to neruodegen in mouse models, it is likely DPR acts upstream fo TDP expalining its better correlation with DEGEN in psot-mortem studies which tend to represent end stages of the disease.
However, Knockin mouse models of C9orf72do not show TDP iclusions. despite observing motor, Cognitive defects with degeneration.
The downstream effects of C9orF72 DPRs have been implicated partiucuarly in issues with Nucleocytoplasmic transport.