Full notes: Private Nuisance Flashcards

(19 cards)

1
Q

private nuisance definition

A
  • The claimant must have an interest in the land (person must own/have a right over the land)
  • There must be unreasonable use of the land which is the source of the nuisance
  • The claimant must suffer some harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do you establish locus standi in private nuisance?

A

Claimants must have a legal interest in the land affected by the nuisance:
- Owners of the property.
- Tenants / leaseholders with exclusive possession.
- Occupiers (in some circumstances)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Case that establishes locus standi

A

Hunter v Canary Wharf (1997)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Foster v Warblington UDC

A

Exclusive possession = has interest in land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Definition of defendants

A

Jones Ltd v Portsmouth City Council: can be any party who creates or allows the nuisance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the things you have to take into account for an unreasonable use of the land?

A
  • Sensitivity of the claimant
  • Nature of the locality
  • Duration
  • Malice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case for abnormal sensitivity

A

Robinson v Kilvert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

was the interference foreseeable?

A

Network Rail Infrastructure v Morris

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What do you have to consider within duration of the interference?

A
  • Interferences should not be continuous and carried on at unreasonable hours of the day
  • A noisy one-off party may not be a nuisance
  • Regular, noisy and late-night parties may amount as a nuisance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the factors of reasonableness?

A
  • locality
  • duration
  • indirect
  • malice
  • social benefit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Locality

A

Surges v Bridgman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Duration (sleep)

A

De Keyser’s Royal Hotel v Spicer Bros

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Indirect interference

A

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Malice

A

Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

social benefit

A

Miller v Jackson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

foreseeability

A

Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather plc / the wagon mound

17
Q

Defence : Civil Aviation Act 1982 s.76

A

It is a defence to private nuisance if the claimant can show that his or her conduct was authorised by law.

18
Q

Defence : prescriptive right

A

Sturges v Bridgman

19
Q

Defence : contributory negligence

A

Sedleigh Denfield v O’Callaghan