Describe Supreme Court verdict for Paul v. Virginia
Insurance is a contract delivered locally, thus insurance contract not interstate commerce. States could continue to regulate own insurance market without violating Constitution
Describe background of Paul v. Virginia
Paul applied to become licensed insurer in home state of VA for NY insurers. VA denied because insurers had not deposited required foreign insurer bond. Paul sold policies anyway and was arrested
Briefly describe the Sherman Act of 1890
Prohibits collusion in attempts to gain monopoly power
Briefly describe 2 schools of thought about insurance compacts:
2. In public’s best interests if it prevented insolvencies
Briefly describe why the indictments against SEUA were initially dismissed:
Based on U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Paul v. Virginia
List activities for which the SEUA received criminal indictments:
List some factors considered when determining whether insurance transactions across state lines constitutes “commerce among several states”:
-Insurance is not a business that is distinct in each of the
states - it is interconnected and interdependent among the states
-Only 18 out of more than 200 SEUA members were domiciled in 1 of the 6 SEUA states
-Intangible products, such as electric impulses of telegraph transmissions, were subject to Congressional regulation
-Other businesses make sales contracts in states where they do not have headquarters, and these are subject to the Commerce Clause
-Not a single business conducting business across state lines is beyond the regulatory powers of congress. Insurers should not be an exception
2 key questions considered by the court when making the decision on SEUA
Describe 2 practices prohibited by the Clayton Act of 1914
- Tying: requiring purchase of 1 product to purchase another
Immediate effect of the SEUA decision
Briefly describe the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act (1914)
Identified and made illegal unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive trade practices
Briefly describe the Robinson-Patman Act (1936)
Amendment to Clayton Act; required price differences to be justified by reduced operating costs
Describe the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945
Returned regulation of insurance back to states, as it was “in the public interest”
State regulators and insurance industry believed some forms of cooperation necessary. As a result, a subcommittee on Federal Legislation was established. List some of its recommendations
Following the McCarran-Ferguson Act, the NAIC and state legislatures began developing and implementing various insurance laws. Briefly describe what these laws were designed to do.
- Keep Congress from controlling competition
List the exceptions for which the McCarran-Ferguson Act will not apply:
List how the NAIC bills (introduced after McCarran-Ferguson) achieved their purposes:
Following the McCarran-Ferguson Act, the NAIC approved two model rate regulation bills. List 2 purposes:
List some activities deemed to be unfair and deceptive by the NAIC Act Relating to Unfair Methods of Competition:
Describe the anti-rebating laws
Prohibits insurers from returning portions of premiums and producers from returning portions of commissions to persons who purchase insurance
List some NAIC programs (after McCarran) to address insurer insolvencies:
Upon what areas is regulation focused on after McCarran-Ferguson:
The following market failures and imperfections:
Briefly describe Surplus Lines insurance:
Insurance coverages obtained from nonadmitted insurers when protection is not available from admitted insurers. Provide coverage for risks that are unique, require high limits, or have difficult underwriting characteristics
After McCarran, briefly describe three ways regulators have addressed unavailable or unaffordable insurance coverages
-To address availability, majority of states have formed FAIR plans
-Another way to address availability is with laws governing captive insurance organizations
-Buyers’ guides explaining standard policies and options can also help consumers find available and affordable choices
-1968 National Flood Insurance Act addressed affordability
-2002 TRIA provided transparent system of shared public
and private compensation for insured losses resulting from terrorist acts
-1981 Risk Retention Act to address affordability of commercial insurance