Gender Flashcards

(57 cards)

1
Q

key moments shaping gender order in Early Modern England, c.1500–1700 - attitude in 1500

A

Patriarchy was divinely ordained (genesis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

key moments shaping gender order in Early Modern England, c.1500–1700, throughout the 16th/early 17th c.

A

The household is a microcosm of the state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

key moments shaping gender order in Early Modern England, 1560-1640

A

Peak anxiety about unruly women and failed patriarchs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

key moments shaping gender order in Early Modern England, 1620.

A

Hic Mulier / Haec Vir pamphlet debate

Haec-Vir(1620) is a pivotal English pamphlet,a witty, Latin-titled response toHic Mulier.
It defended women who adopt masculine dress by engaging in a dialogue with the “Man-Woman” (Hic Mulier) and arguing that men have become “effeminate,” thus necessitating women’s adoption of “manly” roles and attire.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

key moments shaping gender order in Early Modern England, 1642-1660.

A

Civil Wars → “world turned upside down”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

key moments shaping gender order in Early Modern England, late 17th c..

A

Masculinity shifts towards the public, homosocial sphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why was James I’s court criticised as unmanly?

A

1603 – James I ascends English throne

1606 – Danish visit descends into drunken disorder

1600s – Court linked to gambling, sexual laxity, rumours of sodomy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did the Reformation reshape gender relations?

A

Pre-1530s – Clerical celibacy; nunneries as female life paths

1530s–40s – Protestant emphasis on marriage

Post-Reformation – Universal expectation of marriage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why does Laura Gowing argue gender should never be treated as fixed in early modern England?

A

Gender order was historically contingent and locally produced, shaped by rank, age, and marital status. Patriarchy was not monolithic: it operated unevenly and required constant reinforcement. Gender structured social, political, and cultural life, but it was also itself subject to change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Gowing mean by patriarchy “binding everyone caught in its net”?

A

Patriarchy constrained men as well as women.
Masculinity required successful governance of dependents (wives, children, servants). Failure to command obedience undermined male authority, making masculinity fragile and contingent, not secure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is hegemonic masculinity in an early modern context?

A

The idealised model of manhood emphasising authority, self-mastery, independence, and household governance. It justified male dominance while marginalising alternative masculinities (youths, servants, cuckolds, failed patriarchs). Crucially, few men fully achieved it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Susan Amussen and David Underdown,Gender, Culture and Politics in England, 1560-1640: ‘Being a cuckhold was the … of a married man

A

‘inheritance’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Susan Amussen and David Underdown,Gender, Culture and Politics in England, 1560-1640: ‘it was almost impossible to be a …’

A

‘successful patriarch’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is “patriarchal equilibrium” (Judith Bennett)?

A

A feminist concept arguing that despite social or economic change, women’s relative subordination remains stable. In early modern England, women’s expanding economic roles were offset by cultural shaming and punishment of “unruly” women, preserving male dominance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How did Renaissance medical theory justify male superiority?

A

Humoral theory depicted men as hot and dry (active, rational) and women as cold and wet (passive, weak).
Male bodies were seen as perfected; female bodies as defective, reinforcing intellectual, moral, and political hierarchy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the “one-sex model” and why does it matter?

A

According to Thomas Laqueur, early modern medicine viewed women as inverted, inferior versions of men, not biologically distinct. This meant hierarchy was moral and social, not anatomical—making masculinity a status to be defended, not a biological certainty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Thomas Laqueur, One-sex and two-sex model

A

Western medical and philosophical thought underwent a fundamental shift in the 18th century:

from a “one-sex model” in which female anatomy was understood as an inverted, inferior version of male anatomy,
To a “two-sex model” treating men and women as anatomically distinct and opposite.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Why was impotence so threatening to masculinity?

A

Impotence undermined a man’s ability to perform husbandhood and fatherhood, central pillars of masculinity.
It was one of the few accepted grounds for divorce. Remedies for male impotence were complex and mystical, highlighting anxiety around male sexual failure (Gowing).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Why did early modern culture emphasise female orgasm in conception?

A

Medical belief that women had to orgasm to conceive theoretically valued female sexual pleasure.
But in practice it was used to discredit rape victims and blame women for infertility—reinforcing male authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Why was the household central to early modern masculinity?

A

The household was the primary site of authority.
Masculinity was proven through governance of wives, children, and servants.

The household functioned as a microcosm of the state—failure at home implied failure to rule politically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What made patriarchy so unstable in practice?

A

High mortality, economic pressure, adultery, disobedient wives, and servants made control difficult.
Men were held responsible for women’s behaviour, meaning masculinity was constantly vulnerable to exposure and ridicule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Differentiated with violent crimes.

A

Man kills wife - murder,

Woman kills husband - petty treason (harsher punishment).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is Coverture?

A

The idea that a woman’s legal rights and properties were subsumed by those of her husband upon marriage

24
Q

Why were cuckolds such a potent symbol of failed masculinity?

A

A cuckold symbolised a man unable to control his wife’s sexuality.

Even though adultery was common, it publicly emasculated men. Violence against suspected lovers only further exposed patriarchal failure (Amussen & Underdown, p.67).

25
How did coverture reinforce gender hierarchy?
Upon marriage, a woman’s legal identity was absorbed into her husband’s. Married women had fewer legal rights than single women or widows, reinforcing male authority but also making husbands legally accountable for their wives’ behaviour.
26
Why was James I’s court controversial in terms of masculinity?
The court was associated with drunkenness, gambling, sexual excess, and rumours of sodomy. The 1606 visit of Christian IV ended in public drunkenness, symbolising a failure of masculine self-control under a male monarch.
27
How did Charles I’s marriage undermine his political masculinity?
Charles was portrayed as uxorious—submitting to Henrietta Maria. Her Catholicism and influence suggested he lacked authority. In Feb 1645, his refusal to make peace without her return was framed as prioritising wife over state.
28
How was Charles I's masculinity comprimised - gender?
He was positioned more as a father than a King (maintain the masculinity in a different form but the same degree). REMEMBER REPUBLICANS DIDNT EXIST UNTIL AFTER THE REGICIDE. Submit to his wife means disorder, the world turned upside down.
29
How was Charles I’s execution gendered?
Royalists feminised him as a martyr, emphasising sorrow and passivity. Republicans attacked this as irrational and feminine, portraying royalism itself as emotionally excessive and politically weak.
30
Why did Parliamentarians use gender to make Royalists seem irrational?
They claimed that the King was feminine, and any support of feminine leadership is scorned as irrational.
31
How was sexual slander used politically during the Civil Wars?
Accusations of cuckoldry, effeminacy, sodomy, and lust were weapons to undermine opponents’ authority. Masculinity became a political language for legitimacy and credibility.
32
Example of sexual slanderto a Parliamentarian by the Royalists - Robert Devereux, 3rd Earl of Essex.
First marriage was annulled on grounds of non-consummation (she had an affair). The second collapsed when it was suspected that his son from the marriage was the result of an affair had by his wife. By the time of the civil war he was victim to mocking about his sexual history. He was an easy target for royalist contempt as a cuckold (demeaned his masculinity).
33
What did Roundhead vs Cavalier masculinity represent?
Royalists accused Parliamentarians of emasculating cuckoldry and hypocrisy; Parliamentarians depicted Royalists as unmanned by debauchery. Clothing, bodies, and behaviour were central to these gendered attacks.
34
How does Alexandra Shepard challenge the idea of a “crisis” in masculinity?
Shepard argues masculinity was plural and adaptive. Patriarchy was only one strand of manhood; men who failed as patriarchs could draw on alternative masculine codes (military service, public reputation, homosocial honour).
35
What methodological shift does Shepard identify (1500–1700)?
Earlier historians treated manhood as social status (household authority), while later periods emphasised masculinity as cultural performance between men in the public sphere—creating the illusion of dramatic change.
36
How does John Tosh reshape masculinity studies?
Tosh urges historians to analyse masculinity through power relations, not fixed traits. Male superiority was normative, but unevenly experienced—class, age, and marital status mattered.
37
Lady Anne Waller (A Parliamentarian woman)
was painted as a domineering Puritan woman stereotype, she was blamed by Royalists for the failures of her husband, and pictured as unnaturally dominant. However, but to Parliamentarians she was a godly example used to criticise the indulgent royalist women.
38
Civil war divisiions in femininity
For royalists, parliamentarianism drew on a self-righteous, self-indulgent hypocritical Puritanism that was subversive of all order and authority, including male authority. For parliamentarians, royalism was immoral, ‘licentious’, lacking in true godliness, and its female adherents were likely to be wanton whores.
39
Example of families being divided by the Civil War
Basil Fielding, Earl of Denbigh, had to contend with his Royalist wife
40
An example of how women no longer belonged to themselves but their husband after marriage
1631 Countess of Castlehaven’s husband - who was accused, amongst other sexual crimes, of encouraging his manservant to rape her. She testified that her husband 'talked lasciviously to me, and told me my body was his, and if I lay with any man with his consent, 'twas not my fault but his'.
41
Example of female sexual abuse of servants
Mary Dolton made pregnant by her master (1607).
42
Why might masculinity appear “in crisis” to contemporaries?
Because patriarchal authority required constant validation, moments of social, religious, and political upheaval (Reformation, Civil Wars, print culture) made its fragility more visible, not necessarily weaker.
43
What characterises masculinity c.1500–1600?
Household-based authority Patriarchy as moral and political ideal Masculinity proven through governance of women Reformation debates reshape marriage and sexuality ➡ Masculinity anxious but stable in theory
44
Why is 1560–1640 a high point of gender anxiety?
Pamphlet wars (Hic Mulier, Haec Vir, 1620) Fear of unruly women and failed patriarchs Female rulers and widows complicate hierarchy Moral reform among gentry ➡ Masculinity increasingly contested and policed
45
How did the Civil Wars transform masculinity?
Military service offers alternative manhood Sexual slander becomes politicised Authority shifts from household to ideological loyalty Women enter politics through petitioning and print ➡ Masculinity becomes explicitly political
46
What changes after the Restoration?
Masculinity increasingly proved in public, homosocial spaces Less emphasis on household governance alone Print culture shapes reputation ➡ Shift from anxious patriarch → refined gentleman
47
Was early modern masculinity truly “in crisis”?
Masculinity was not collapsing but structurally fragile. Patriarchy demanded constant performance and discipline, making failure highly visible. Political upheaval, print culture, and social change exposed these tensions, but men adapted through alternative masculine identities. The “crisis” reflects anxiety and visibility, not breakdown.
48
Who was John Knox, and what was The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women (1558)?
John Knox was a Scottish Protestant reformer who published The First Blast of the Trumpet in 1558, a polemical work arguing that female rule was illegitimate, ungodly, and contrary to natural law.
49
What was Knox’s central argument against female monarchy?
Knox argued that women were inherently unfit to rule as monarchs because female authority violated both divine scripture and the natural order established by God.
50
How did Knox use religion to oppose female rule?
Knox claimed that promoting women to positions of political authority was contrary to the will of God and represented a “subversion of good order, of all equity and justice.”
51
How did Knox use nature, not just scripture, to support his argument?
Knox argued that women’s physical and emotional characteristics proved they were naturally unsuited to governance, reinforcing the idea that female rule disrupted the natural hierarchy.
52
How did Knox use the biblical figure of Jezebel?
Knox used Jezebel as a warning example of female authority leading to tyranny, moral corruption, and the persecution of God’s people.
53
How did John Aylmer redefine the nature of monarchy?
Aylmer argued that ruling was not the responsibility of the monarch alone, but a collective process involving Parliament, councils, and legal structures. His argument allowed contemporaries to accept a female monarch without challenging patriarchal assumptions about women’s natural inferiority.
54
Why is Knox’s work historiographically significant?
Knox’s text shows how gendered assumptions about authority were embedded in early modern political theory and used to legitimise resistance to monarchy.
55
How does Aylmer’s argument contrast with Knox’s?
Where Knox saw female rule as inherently illegitimate, Aylmer argued that constitutional limits made the monarch’s gender largely irrelevant.
56
How was Mary I commonly criticised by contemporaries?
Mary I was often criticised not primarily for her Catholicism, but for her perceived emotional excess, passion, and feminine weakness.
57
Why was femininity used as a political critique of Mary I?
Femininity was associated with irrationality and instability, making it a powerful way to delegitimise her authority.