Whatmore (2006)
theories enable us to return to the world with new eyes, turn familiar matters over and over, see what is familiar as strange
Barnett (2009)
Theory = any set of statements and propositions used in explanation / interpretation
- set prepositions allow us to understand the world
Harvey (1969)
Likened theory to a map
- selective portrays of the world
Hubbard et al (2002)
“It is tempting to dismiss theory, or to try to avoid it because it seems difficult. But the reality of doing geography [or thinking full stop] is that we cannot avoid theory. Theory infuses the practices of academic geography. In trying to understand the world about us, even in common-sense and non-academic ways (e.g. trying to predict who might win a political election or knowing where to shop for particular products), we are constantly employing theoretical tools and making claims or judgments about how the world works”
Aitken and Valentine (2006)
“‘Ways of knowing’ [i.e. theories ] drive not only individual research projects but also the creative potential of geography as a discipline. Philosophies and theories, as ways of knowing, are not simply academic pursuits with little bearing on how we work and how we live our lives”
Colebrook (2002)
“Concepts are not labels or names that we attach to things; they produce an orientation or a direction for thinking. A concept … is just this power to move beyond what we know and experience”
Kuhn (1970)
Books of use
Kwan (2004) Geography Rifts
Martin (2013)
understand groups/belongings two ways - object-based (attention object, what is similar, create group w boundary and fixed idea - eg. twin focused on fact twin, hides difference) - vs relational (eg twin understood in relation others/ through exploration difference - concept in relation to other twins/ people not in category).
ADI OPHIR (2012)
“A term becomes a concept only when we take the time to disengage it from its daily uses in order to put it on display, wonder about its meaning, explicate it”
COLLINI (2012)
‘Being critical’ calls into question knowledge as “truth”. It recognises that things are not fixed or eternal or universal or self-sufficient