General Defences Flashcards

(15 cards)

1
Q

What is the general defence of self-defence?

A

Self-defence is a general defence used where a defendant uses force to protect themselves, another person, or property. If successful, it results in a full acquittal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which areas of law can self-defence apply to?

A

It applies to both crimes against the person and certain property offences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What two key elements must be proven for self-defence to succeed?

A
  1. the force was necessary
  2. the force used must be reasonable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is “necessity of force” determined?

A

The jury asks whether the defendant honestly believed force was necessary, even if that belief was mistaken.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which case shows that an honest mistake can make force necessary?

A

R v Williams - A mistaken belief can be relied upon if it was honestly held, even if unreasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Does the defendant have a duty to retreat before using force?

A

No. there is no duty to retreat, but attempting to retreat can support the argument that force was necessary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case shows that pre-emptive strikes can be allowed

A

R v Beckford - A person may use force to defend themselves if they honestly believe an attack is imminent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does “reasonable force” mean?

A

The force use mist be proportionate to the threat as the defendant honestly believed it to be.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who decides whether the force used was reasonable?

A

The jury, using the objective standard of the “reasonable person”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which case explains that the defendant does not need to “weigh to a nicety” the exact amount of force?

A

R v Palmer - the law recognises that decisions in emergencies may be instinctive, and some leeway is given.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Can excessive force ever be considered reasonable?

A

No. If the defendant uses grossl execessive force, the defence fails (especially relevant in murder)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did the case of R v Martin apply excessive force?

A

The defendant shot burgulars with execessive force; the court ruled it was disproportionate, so self-defence failed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can self-defence apply if force is used against an innocent person?

A

Yes, if the defendant honestly but mistakenly believed force was necessary (R v Williams)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 state about reasonable force?

A

It confirms that force is reasonable if it is proportionate and the defendant acted instinctively based on an honest belief of the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Are householders given extra protection when facing intruders?

A

Yes, under the Crime and Courts Act 2013, householders may use disproportionate (but not “grossly disproportionate”) force when confronting intruders at home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly