What is the definition of involuntary manslaughter?
Involuntary manslaughter is the unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being without the intention to kill or cause GBH.
What is gross negligence manslaughter?
Gross negligence manslaughter occurs when a person’s negligent behavior, which leads to death, is so severe it requires punishment under criminal law.
What is the actus reus (AR) of murder?
The actus reus of murder is unlawfully killing a reasonable person in being.
What is the mens rea (MR) for murder?
The mens rea for murder is the intention to kill or cause GBH.
What is voluntary manslaughter?
Voluntary manslaughter is the unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being with the intention to kill or cause GBH, but with a partial defense of diminished responsibility (DR) or loss of control (LC).
What are the three elements needed for a successful conviction of gross negligence manslaughter?
What case established the neighbour principle for determining duty of care?
The neighbour principle was established in Donoghue v Stevenson (1932).
Give an example of a case where a duty of care was established.
R v Singh (1999) - A landlord owed a duty to his tenants to maintain a gas fire.
In R v Litchfield (1998), what duty was recognized?
The master of a sailing ship owed a duty to the crew when he sailed knowing that the engines would fail.
What does the Bateman test determine?
The Bateman test determines whether negligence is ‘gross’ and amounts to a crime deserving punishment.
What happened in the case of Duckenfield (2019)?
Duckenfield was charged with 95 counts of gross negligence manslaughter related to the Hillsborough disaster but was acquitted by a jury after a retrial.
Fill in the blank: The negligence is considered ‘gross’ when it shows such disregard for the life and safety of others to amount to a _______.
[crime against the State]
True or False: A breach of duty must be unlawful to constitute gross negligence manslaughter.
False.
What is the significance of R v Evans (2009) in relation to gross negligence manslaughter?
In R v Evans, the defendant was guilty of gross negligence manslaughter for failing to call an ambulance for her sister who self-injected heroin.
What does the legal principle from R v Wacker (2002) state regarding duty of care?
A duty of care can exist between participants in a joint illegal act, even if they are also perpetrating the crime together.
What are usual rules of causation applied to in gross negligence manslaughter?
The usual rules of causation apply to determine if the breach of duty caused the death.