Hill 1982
why is comparing groups hard?
task type -intellective vs judgement tasks -well-defined vs ill-defined tasks standards of comparison -how are you going to say whether it is good or bad decision? coordination methods -no discussion --> averaging -iterative --> everyone gives answers, you see them and then can adjust if you want -pick best person -discussion --> consensus individual differences
when does averaging work?
-when individuals provide independent estimates for when errors are unrelated to each other, not influenced by others judgements, no systematic bias and no coordination in discussion between group members
what are correlated errors vs uncorrelated errors
what is polarisation in group decision making?
when group becomes obsessed with a single answer defined by single member and become impervious to signals that might suggest it is wrong
interactionist account
-reason evolved to produce and evaluate arguments, not for individuals to solve problems
how do groups reason?
does general intelligence of group members predict collective intelligence?
-no, groups of smart people didn’t outperform groups of less smart people
what are predictors of group intelligence?
why is the “reading the mind in they eyes” test a good predictor of group intelligence?
because group function is primarily predicted by coordination, not the intelligence of individual’s in the group
What is the correct order of the stages in Gigone & Hastie (1997)’s lens model of group decision making?
cue perception, Individual judgement, judgement revision