TEAMWORKING SKILLS
WHY DOES TEAMWORK MATTER?
THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GROUPS AND TEAMS
Groups:
* Focus on individual goals and performance
* No clear leader or structure
* Communication is informal and spontaneous
* Members may not have complementary skills or shared accountability
* Decisions are often made by the leader or through consensus
Teams:
* Focus on collective goals and performance
* Clear leader and structure
* Communication is formal and planned
* Members have complementary skills and shared accountability
* Decisions are made through collaboration and consensus-building
In summary, while both groups and teams involve individuals working together towards a common goal, teams tend to be more
structured, collaborative, and focused on collective achievement.
BENEFITS OF TEAMWORK
BENEFITS OF TEAMWORK
BENEFITS OF TEAMWORK TO EMPLOYEES:
BENEFITS OF TEAMWORK TO ORGANIZATIONS:
PROBLEMS OF TEAMWORK
HIGH-PERFORMANCE TEAMS
High-performance teams are groups of individuals who collaborate and share the responsibility of achieving a common goal or
completing a task. Some of the characteristics of high-performance teams include:
* Clear goals and objectives: The team has a clear understanding of what they are trying to achieve and what success
looks like.
* Trust and communication: The team members trust each other and communicate effectively.
* Complementary skills: The team members have a range of skills that complement each other.
* Accountability: The team members hold each other accountable for their actions and decisions.
* Openness to feedback: The team members are open to giving and receiving feedback.
* Creativity: The team members are open to new ideas and are willing to take risks.
* Leadership: The team has a clear leader who sets the tone for the team and provides guidance and support when
needed.
To create a high-performance team, it is important to focus on building strong relationships among team members, providing
clear direction and support, and promoting open communication and collaboration.
PREVENTS GOOD PERFORMANCE
Problems:
* A lack of conviction that a team can work better than other alternatives
* Personal styles and capabilities make teams risky
* Weak organizational performance ethics
* Size – too large prevents common purpose forming
Solutions:
* Complementary skills
* Common purpose
* Common approach
* Mutual accountability
A SUCCESSFUL TEAM?
Working group:
* No significant performance goals that require members to become a team.
* Members interact only to share information to complete personal tasks.
* Not considered a real team.
Pseudo-team:
* Potentially significant performance but not focused on collective targets.
* Members may be interacting for personal gains rather than for team goals.
* Not considered a real team.
Potential team:
* Making progress but needs more focus on aims and purposes.
* Members have a common goal but not fully committed to a common approach.
* Not considered a real team.
Real team:
* Small number of members with complementary skills.
* Committed to a common purpose, goals, and approach.
* Mutual accountability among members.
* Considered a real team.
High-performance team:
* Real team with deeply committed members to each other’s personal growth and professional success.
* High enthusiasm and energy levels.
* Event-driven histories and personal commitment.
* Achieve exceptional results.
* Considered the ideal type of team.
TEAMWORK PERFORMANCE
Katzenbach and Smith’s teamwork performance curve includes four stages:
1. Pseudo-Teams: The initial stage of team development, where individuals are not yet working together and may not see
the value in teamwork.
2. Potential Teams: In this stage, individuals start to collaborate and become more focused on common goals.
3. Real Teams: At this stage, the group of individuals has become a team that is committed to common goals,
complementary skills, and mutual accountability.
4. High-Performance Teams: At this final stage, real teams become high-performing by achieving outstanding results,
having a strong sense of purpose, and mutual trust and respect among team members.
The curve suggests that team performance can increase as teams move through each stage. However, if teams don’t progress
beyond the pseudo-team stage, performance will suffer. To develop high-performing teams, organizations must provide the
necessary support and resources for team members to develop trust, collaboration, and a shared sense of purpose.
IMPLICATIONS
BELBIN’S TEAM ROLES
PROBLEMS WITH BELBIN
GROUP FORMATION
TUCKMAN’S THEORY ASSESSED
Strengths:
* Helps in understanding the process of team formation
* Helps in understanding that team development is not always a smooth process
* Based on some empirical research
Weaknesses:
* Assumes a linear process to team development, which may not always be the case in practice
* The boundaries between stages are often blurred
* It is debatable whether teams have to go through all these stages to be successful
* The theory may be culturally specific and not applicable to all teams.
UNCONSCIOUS GROUP DYNAMICS
SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY
BAY OF PIGS FIASCO
EMPOWERMENT CONTINUUM
The empowerment continuum is a tool that helps managers identify how much decision-making power and control they should
delegate to employees. It is a spectrum that ranges from low empowerment, where managers make all decisions, to high
empowerment, where employees are fully autonomous and make all decisions themselves. The continuum includes the
following five levels:
➢ Directed empowerment: Managers give employees limited decision-making power but still have the final say.
➢ Consultative empowerment: Managers solicit employee input and feedback before making decisions.
➢ Participative empowerment: Managers delegate decision-making power to employees but still retain some control.
➢ Self-managing teams: Employees are given complete control over decision making within their team.
➢ Autonomous empowerment: Employees are fully autonomous and have the power to make all decisions without
managerial oversight.
The empowerment continuum is useful for managers who want to balance the need for control with the benefits of employee
autonomy and involvement. It is important to note that not all employees or situations are suitable for high levels of
empowerment, and managers should carefully consider the needs of the organization and employees when deciding where on
the continuum to operate.
A MORE SUBTLE FORM OF CONTROL