GTR Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

how to determine true perio regeneration

A

-histology (not practical)
-CAL gain
-PD reduction
-recession
-bone fill (radiographically or direct inspection)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

non-resorbable vs bioabsorbable barriers

A

Murphy and Gunsolley 2003: no difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

GTR versus OFD for intrabony defects

A

Cortellini 1996:
-5.2mm gain in CAL vs. 2.3mm gain for OFD

OFD resulted in a higher risk for disease recurrence compared to regenerative procedures over a 20-year period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

GTR versus OFD for furcation defects

A

Murphy and Gunsolley: GTR> OFD
-improved CAL and PD, esp if GTR+bone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

GTR versus GTR+bone for intrabony defects

A

(Murphy and Gunsolley 2003):
-use of bone did not enhace regen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

EMD versus EMD+bone/membrane

A

Tu 2010 meta analysis:
-EMD+bone had 1mm more infrabony defect fill than EMD alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the grading system for CEPs

A

Masters, Hoskins 1964
Grade I: distinct change projecting towards the furcation,
Grade II: approaching the entrance but not in the furcation proper,
Grade III: extending into the furcation proper.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

prevalence of CEPs in mand and max teeth

A

Masters, Hoskins 1964
28% mandibular
17% maxillary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How do CEPs affect periodontal treatment

A

-Enamel prevents attachment of the PDL fibers
- leads to a deep pocket and lower attachment and furcation involvement
-Susceptible to plaque accumulation and affects plaque removal
-Complicates SRP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the width of the furcation entrance

A

Bower 1979
In 81% of the furcation of maxillary and mandibular molars the entrance was found to be 1.0mm or less and in 58% it was <0.75mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

4 different cell types that can repopulate root surface after periodontal surgery

A

-epi, CT, bone, and PDL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are your goals for GTR?

A

-Increase in attachment
-Increase in bone
-Decrease in PD
-Minimal increase in recession
-Furcation closure!
-Tooth survival

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can you have regeneration on root surfaces that previously harboured plaque?

A

-Gottlow 1984 proved that if you scaled roots, used a Millipore filter, you can get regeneration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When do you decide to treat a defect with GTR?

A

-Cortellini and tonetti 2000: deeper defects (more than 3mm) benefit the most, getting superior CAL gains than shallower defects
-narrow defects <25 degrees had more attachment than >37 deg regenerative therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

*Which factors influence the success of periodontal regenerative therapy? (11 points)

A

DEFECT
1) # bony walls
2) depth of defect
3) width of defect
4) angle of defect

TOOTH
5) endo involvement
6) mobility

SURGERY
7) flap design
8) flap thickness
9) PASS principles

PATIENT
10) smoking
11) OH/SPT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why do you remove sutures after 2 weeks

A

(Hiatt) flap doesnt reach functional integrity until 2 weeks post-surgery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Bioexclusion

A

Using a barrier membrane to prevent epithelial migration, which then favors the repopulation of PDL cells and perivascular cells to differentiate into cementoblasts, fibroblasts, and osteoblasts, form the alveolar bone, PDL, and cementum

18
Q
  • Is DFDBA superior to FDBA?
A

-DFDBA may potentially have osteoinductive properties as well due to BMPs
-Bowers et al: histologically verified true periodontal regeneration at intrabony defects using DFDBA
-Rummelhart 1989: no difference between FDBA and DFDBA
-2015 AAP consensus: concluded that DFDBA had the best body of evidence to support it as a predictable material for regeneration

19
Q

Does commercially available DFDBA contain enough active BMP?

A

it is unpredictable due to:
-donor age
-difference in processing and sterilization protocols
-particle size
-some is inactive

20
Q

Is there a high risk of disease transmission with allografts?

A

-Mellonig 1992: treatment of DFDBA successfully inactivates HIV

21
Q

What is the mechanism of action of EMDs?

A

EMD is a mixture of amelogenins which are involved in the formation of the periodontal apparatus during tooth development. By using EMD, they mimic the events that occur during tooth development and stimulate periodontal regeneration

EMD comes from piglet tooth buds

22
Q

Hamp Classification: (horizontal measurement)

A

F1: probe can penetrate furcation < 3mm
F2: probe >3mm but not through and through
F3: through and through furcation involvement

23
Q

Glickman Classification:

A

Grade 1: incipient suprabony lesion
Grade 2: loss of interradicular bone, but a portion remains intact
Grade 3: through and through (no bone attached at fornix); not clinically visible
Grade 4: through and through lesion; clinically visible; soft tissue has receded apically

24
Q

Tarnow and Fletcher classification: subclassification of Glickman: *measures VERTICAL probing depth from the roof of the furcation

A

A: 0-3mm
B: 4-6mm
C: >7mm

25
how often do you get furcation closure in Grade II furcations with GTR
Bowers: Complete closure in 75%, remaining 70% are converted to Class I
26
what are some bioactive agents used in regeneration
-rh-PDGF -EMD -PRP/PRF -BMP
27
are biologics effective in tx intrabony defects
AAP Regeneartion workshop 2015 Kao: the use of EMD or rh-PDGF is effective in tx intrabony defects
28
Regeneration for intrabony defects
AAP Consensus statement by Avila-Ortiz 2022 -combo therapies (bone+EMD or bone+barrier) are most effective -allografts and xenografts are ideal
29
survival rate of GTR
Cortellini and Tonetti 96% after 8 years (89% for smokers and 100% for non-smokers)
30
benefit of having biologic
-promotion and acceleration of healing and regeneration -reduced risk of postoperative complications -improved treatment outcomes -improved handling of bone -can be minimaly invasive and avoid large elevated flaps for membranes
31
OFD versus GTR for furcations
Murphy and Gunsolley -GTR>OFD Chen: -GTR+bone was most effective for furcation closure
33
factors that affect GTR for furcations
1) distance between the roof of furcation and crest of bone buccally and interproximally 2) roof of furcation and base of defect 3) depth of horizontal defect 4) root divergence should all be <4mm (Bowers 2003)
34
does root conditioning improve outcomes for GTR
Mariotti- no difference in outcomes
35
what do you expect for outcomes of GTR
5.2mm of CAL gain (Cortellini 1999) 95% defect closure for 3-wall defect and 80% defect closure for 2-wall defect (Cortellini)
36
*what are your surgical steps for GTR after flap reflectioN/
1) flap reflection (MPPF, intrasulcular on B and L surfaces) 2) thorough SRP 3) inspect for any local factors or fractures (odontoplasty if needed) 4) EMD pref gel (24% EDTA for root conditioning) 5) add EMD to root 6) add bone graft mixed with EMD to bone defect 7) re-approximate flaps with vertical mattress sutures and ensure primary wound closure
37
*what are important principles of regeneration?
PASS principles Primary closure Angiogenesis Space maintenance Wound stability
38
* what is your post op instructions
1) antibiotics (amoxicillin) 2) analgesics (ibuprofen), also for swelling 3) chx mouth rinse 3) soft diet 4) avoid brushing area 5) 2 week post op
39
*what are your perio diagnoses for palatal root groove with deep PD and slight swelling and suppuration and close to apex
1) local tooth related factors predisposing to periodontal diseases - palatal groove 2) periodontal abscess in a non-perio pt - alteration of root surface - minor anatomical alteration - developmental groove 3) endo-perio lesion with root damage - palatal groove
40
how long should you wait to do GTR if you have an endo-perio lesion
should wait at least 3 months after endo to do the GTR
41
*how to assess the outcome of your GTR surgery
1) cannot assess true regeneration unless it is looked at histologically 2) PD <=3mm 3) minimal to no recession 4) need CBCT to assess bone fill 5) no plaque or BOP