how to determine true perio regeneration
-histology (not practical)
-CAL gain
-PD reduction
-recession
-bone fill (radiographically or direct inspection)
non-resorbable vs bioabsorbable barriers
Murphy and Gunsolley 2003: no difference
GTR versus OFD for intrabony defects
Cortellini 1996:
-5.2mm gain in CAL vs. 2.3mm gain for OFD
OFD resulted in a higher risk for disease recurrence compared to regenerative procedures over a 20-year period
GTR versus OFD for furcation defects
Murphy and Gunsolley: GTR> OFD
-improved CAL and PD, esp if GTR+bone
GTR versus GTR+bone for intrabony defects
(Murphy and Gunsolley 2003):
-use of bone did not enhace regen
EMD versus EMD+bone/membrane
Tu 2010 meta analysis:
-EMD+bone had 1mm more infrabony defect fill than EMD alone
What is the grading system for CEPs
Masters, Hoskins 1964
Grade I: distinct change projecting towards the furcation,
Grade II: approaching the entrance but not in the furcation proper,
Grade III: extending into the furcation proper.
prevalence of CEPs in mand and max teeth
Masters, Hoskins 1964
28% mandibular
17% maxillary
How do CEPs affect periodontal treatment
-Enamel prevents attachment of the PDL fibers
- leads to a deep pocket and lower attachment and furcation involvement
-Susceptible to plaque accumulation and affects plaque removal
-Complicates SRP
What is the width of the furcation entrance
Bower 1979
In 81% of the furcation of maxillary and mandibular molars the entrance was found to be 1.0mm or less and in 58% it was <0.75mm
4 different cell types that can repopulate root surface after periodontal surgery
-epi, CT, bone, and PDL
What are your goals for GTR?
-Increase in attachment
-Increase in bone
-Decrease in PD
-Minimal increase in recession
-Furcation closure!
-Tooth survival
Can you have regeneration on root surfaces that previously harboured plaque?
-Gottlow 1984 proved that if you scaled roots, used a Millipore filter, you can get regeneration
When do you decide to treat a defect with GTR?
-Cortellini and tonetti 2000: deeper defects (more than 3mm) benefit the most, getting superior CAL gains than shallower defects
-narrow defects <25 degrees had more attachment than >37 deg regenerative therapy
*Which factors influence the success of periodontal regenerative therapy? (11 points)
DEFECT
1) # bony walls
2) depth of defect
3) width of defect
4) angle of defect
TOOTH
5) endo involvement
6) mobility
SURGERY
7) flap design
8) flap thickness
9) PASS principles
PATIENT
10) smoking
11) OH/SPT
why do you remove sutures after 2 weeks
(Hiatt) flap doesnt reach functional integrity until 2 weeks post-surgery
Bioexclusion
Using a barrier membrane to prevent epithelial migration, which then favors the repopulation of PDL cells and perivascular cells to differentiate into cementoblasts, fibroblasts, and osteoblasts, form the alveolar bone, PDL, and cementum
-DFDBA may potentially have osteoinductive properties as well due to BMPs
-Bowers et al: histologically verified true periodontal regeneration at intrabony defects using DFDBA
-Rummelhart 1989: no difference between FDBA and DFDBA
-2015 AAP consensus: concluded that DFDBA had the best body of evidence to support it as a predictable material for regeneration
Does commercially available DFDBA contain enough active BMP?
it is unpredictable due to:
-donor age
-difference in processing and sterilization protocols
-particle size
-some is inactive
Is there a high risk of disease transmission with allografts?
-Mellonig 1992: treatment of DFDBA successfully inactivates HIV
What is the mechanism of action of EMDs?
EMD is a mixture of amelogenins which are involved in the formation of the periodontal apparatus during tooth development. By using EMD, they mimic the events that occur during tooth development and stimulate periodontal regeneration
EMD comes from piglet tooth buds
Hamp Classification: (horizontal measurement)
F1: probe can penetrate furcation < 3mm
F2: probe >3mm but not through and through
F3: through and through furcation involvement
Glickman Classification:
Grade 1: incipient suprabony lesion
Grade 2: loss of interradicular bone, but a portion remains intact
Grade 3: through and through (no bone attached at fornix); not clinically visible
Grade 4: through and through lesion; clinically visible; soft tissue has receded apically
Tarnow and Fletcher classification: subclassification of Glickman: *measures VERTICAL probing depth from the roof of the furcation
A: 0-3mm
B: 4-6mm
C: >7mm