What is a Contract?
*UNiverse one - common law
- We are in this universe whenvere a contract deals with real estate or services
*Universe two - Article 2 of the UCC
- We are in this universe whenever a contracst deals with goods
- Note 1: The UCC governs all parties who enter into a goods contract, not just merchants
- Note 2: The law of contracts is often the same in both universes, with some key differences arising on the MBE
Mixed Contracts
Rule #1: The all or nothing rule. You cannot be in two universes at the same time, so ixed contracts must fall into one universe or the other
- Exception: dividslbe contracts - the agreement is divided into two mini-contracts
Rule #2: The predominant purpose rule. Does a good or a service play a bigger role?
Formation in General
Agreement
Offer
o Offer and acceptance are governed by the objective test.
- The outward appearance of words and actions matters—not secret intentions.
o Key question—whether an offeror displays an objectively serious intent to be bound
Note 5: Watch out for situations involving humor or anger - the offeor may not be displaying a serious intent to be bound under the objetive test
Expression of opinion is not an offer
Offer and Direction of Offer
o An offer must usually be directed to a specific offeree. In other words, you cannot accept an offer unless it is directed at you.
- Example 11: You hear that there are a lot of good deals to be had on Wall Street. So you walk down through the trading pit, saying “I accept. I accept. I accept.” Do you have any contracts with the stock traders? no.
Limited exception—contest offers or reward offers that promise something to anyone who accomplishes a certain task
- Example 12: I’ve lost my pet cat, Monster, and I take out a newspaper advertisement promising $100 to anyone who finds my cat by this Friday. You see the ad, find Monster, and come by my house on Thursday to collect the reward. Do we have a contractual agreement? yes.
Offer and Specificity
How specific must your offer be? Two slightly different rules for the two different universes:
Common law—All essential terms must be covered in the agreement.
* This typically means the parties, subject, price, and quantity.
UCC—The law is more willing to fill the gap and find a contract, even if the agreement leaves out some key terms.
* Under the UCC, the only essential term is the quantity.
* The price does not need to be stated.
Offers and Requirement Contract
“I don’t know how many I need over the next year, but I promise to buy all of them from you.”
The buyer is offering to buy 100% of whatever amount is needed from this individual seller.
Offers and Output Contract
o Output contract: “I don’t know how many I will make over the next year, but I promise to sell all of them to you.”
The seller is offering to sell 100% of whatever amount is produced to this individual buyer.
o Both output and requirements contracts are specific enough under the UCC, even though they don’t state an exact quantity term—they provide a formula for calculation.
Offer and Power of Acceptance
A valid offer must convey the power of acceptance to the other side (i.e., the offeree can simply say “I accept” and know that he has concluded the deal).
Exam Tip 1: Here are two common fact patterns testing this concept:
invitations to deal —a preliminary communication that reserves a final right of approval with the speaker. It does not convey a power of acceptance to the other side.
Advertisement—usually understood as an invitation to deal (e.g., “Make me an offer for the advertised item; I’ll probably accept it.”). There are some exceptions:
- Reward advertisements (see Example 12, above)
- Advertisements that are very specific and leave nothing open to negotiation, including how acceptance can occur
Terminating the Offer
Irrevocable Offers (Caterpillar’s “Power Shield”)
Irrevocable Offer and Option
Option - yes
Irrevocable Offer and Firm Offer
o A merchant in the UCC universe can make a firm offer to buy or sell goods (i.e., a binding, free option).
Merchant—someone who regularly deals in the type of good at issue
* I.e., a business person, or a person holding himself out as having knowledge or skills particular to the goods
For purposes of this rule, a merchant is any business person, when the transaction is commercial in nature.
o A firm offer must be written, signed by the offeror, and contain an explicit promise not to revoke.
o Time period—either: (i) as long as stated in the offer, or (ii) for a reasonable time period not to exceed 90 days
Editorial Note 1: According to UCC 2-205, the “reasonable time” is not to exceed three months.
Irrevocable Offer - Unilateral Contract - Offeree has Started Performance
o A unilateral offer to contract cannot be revoked by the offeror if the offeree has started to perform.
Unilateral contract—arises from a promise that requests acceptance by an action of the promisee
* Compare this with a request for a return promise, which is a “bilateral contract.”
Example 36: “I promise to pay you $1,000 if you promise to paint my house.” Unilateral or bilateral? bilateral.
Example 37: “I promise to pay you $1,000 if you take the action of painting my house.” Unilateral or bilateral? unilateral.
o Because a unilateral contract can be accepted only by performance, the law gives the promisee the right to finish.
Example 38: I promise $10,000 to the winner of a swim race to Alcatraz Island. The swimmers dive off the dock and are going strong toward the island. When they’re about halfway, I stand up on Fisherman’s Wharf with my bullhorn and yell “I REVOKE!” Can the winner of the race insist on the prize? yes, this is a unilateral offer with part performance.
Note 9: The offeree is not required to complete performance and can stop at any time.
Example 39: You are swimming in the Alcatraz race, but you get tired and swim to a boat. Can I sue you for breach of contract? No; there’s no agreement.
Irrevocable Offers - Detrimental Reliance
o Arises when an offeree reasonably and detrimentally relies on the offer in some foreseeable manner
Look especially for a general contractor/subcontractor context.
This is a special variant of the reliance theory of contractual liability (sometimes called “promissory estoppel”).
Example 40: A builder who is bidding on a law school building project receives an offer from a subcontractor to supply all of the carpet for $20,000. Armed with this knowledge, the builder offers to renovate the building for $100,000. Before the law school accepts the bid, the subcontractor calls to revoke its carpet offer. Can the general contractor builder still accept the carpet offer from the subcontractor? Yes.
Acceptance
o Unilateral versus bilateral offers—The offeror decides which type of offer to make, and the offeree must play by those rules.
Example 42: “I promise to pay you $1,000 if, and only when, you paint my house.” You say, “I accept.” Is there a contract? No, you haven’t done what I said you must do to accept.
Example 43: Bob sends a letter to Sue, reading “please ship me 500 windshield wiper blades next week for $5 each.” Sue mails back a letter saying, “I accept.” Unilateral or bilateral offer? Unclear without more information. Is there a contract? Yes, under the modern approach.
Note 10: Under the modern approach, if there is an ambiguity about whether the offer is unilateral or bilateral, acceptance can be by either performance or a return promise.
Example 44: Bob sends a letter to Sue, reading “please ship me 500 windshield wiper blades by next week for $5 each.” Sue ships 500 wiper blades the next day. Is there a contract? Yes.
Note 11: TRICK What if the seller tries to accept by shipping the wrong goods? The UCC treats this as acceptance plus breach.
Example 45: Bob sends a letter to Sue, reading “please ship me 500 Bosch windshield wiper blades by next week for $5 each.” Sue ships 500 Sloshed wiper blades the next day. Is there a contract? ________, but also a breach.
Otther Acceptance Rules
Mailbox Rule
o General rationale—to determine when an acceptance has been legally communicated when there is some delay between sending and receiving
o The Rule—An acceptance sent by mail is effective when the letter is sent.
o Does not apply:
1) If the offeree sends something else back first (e.g., rejection, counteroffer);
2) To other types of communications (e.g., revocations, rejections);
3) To option contracts; or
4) It is unclear whether this applies to other media (e.g., fax, e-mail).
Example 48: I send you an offer. You mail back your acceptance. I call you before I receive your letter and revoke. Is there a contract? Yes.
Example 49: I send you an offer. You mail back your acceptance. The letter gets lost and never shows up. Is there a contract? Yes.
Example 50: I send you an offer. You mail back your acceptance. You change your mind and call me up before I receive your letter to reject the offer. Is there a contract? yes, unless I detrimentally relied on the rejection.
Example 51: I send you an offer. You mail back a rejection. You change your mind and mail back an acceptance a few hours later. Both letters arrive at my house on the same day. Is there a contract? Maybe. It depends on which letter I open first.
Acceptance without Communication (By Silence)
o There are some exceptions to the requirement that you must communicate an acceptance to the offeror.
o Look for one of the following:
Unilateral reward offers or contests (e.g., my lost cat Monster)
Unilateral offer in which the parties are geographically close (such that the offeror will see that performance has occurred)
A past history of silence serving as acceptance (such that the offeree should reasonably notify the offeror if she does not accept)
The offer says that acceptance must come by silence, and the offeree intends to accept the offer by silence.
Example 52: I’ve lost my pet cat, Monster, and I take out a newspaper advertisement promising $100 to anyone who finds my cat by this Friday. You see the ad, find Monster, and come by my house on Thursday to collect the reward. Can you get the money even though you never communicated your acceptance to me? Yes.
Example 53: Mickey buys her weekly keg of beer by calling up Pabst on Monday and leaving a message requesting delivery on Friday. One Monday, she leaves her message as usual, but Pabst does not deliver the keg that Friday. Distraught, Mickey asks if she has a contract for this keg. Does she? Likely yes.
Example 54: I offer to sell you my Jeep for $500,000, saying “you may accept this offer by remaining silent for five seconds.” You stare at me but don’t say a word. After five seconds pass, do we have a contract? No, unless you intend to accept.
Implied-in-Fact Contracts
o You can communicate an acceptance without writing or speaking.
o This communication by gestures or actions is called an “implied-in-fact” contract.
Example 55: I walk into Cheapcuts, a popular haircut franchise where the service offerings and prices are posted above the cash register. The energetic receptionist offers to put my name in, and I sit down to wait. A short time later, someone comes forward and calls my name. I follow, and she cuts my hair. When I walk toward the exit, the receptionist tells me that I owe them $15. Must I pay—even though I never said a single word? Yes - implied in fact contract
Common Law Counteroffers
UCC 2-207 Counteroffers
UCC Acceptance
Text of § 2-207(1): “A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance [or a written confirmation] which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional upon assent to the additional or different terms.”
Example 58: You send a purchase order requesting acceptance by this Friday. I send back my confirming memo two weeks later. Is there a contract? No, because the purported acceptance is not timely.
Example 59: You send a purchase order. I send back a timely confirming memo saying “Thanks, but I no longer sell chainsaws; however, I have a hand saw which you can have on the same terms.” Is there a contract? No, because this is not a definite acceptance of the original offer.
Example 60: You send a purchase order. I send back a timely confirming memo saying “OK, on the condition that you agree to indemnify me against a lawsuit for harm arising from the chainsaw.” Do we have a contract? No.
Example 61: Same facts as Example 60, but my acceptance letter has a bunch of terms on the back, all of which match yours, except for a clause that says “Buyer agrees to indemnify seller against a lawsuit for harm arising from the chainsaw.” Do we have a contract? Yes, under § 2-207(1).