Are you aware of any recent updates to CPD requirements?
Yes - new regulation introduced effective 31 January 2026
RICS continuing
professional development
rules: requirements
What are the CPD requirements outlined in ‘RICS continuing
professional development
rules: requirements 2026’?
What are the mandatory CPD topics effective from January 31 2026?
What are the requirements for these?
How does war (e.g. the Middle East conflict) impact property valuation?
Dominant factors are inflation, interest rates and confidence, leading to:
* Slower transactions
* Regional price divergence
* Continued rental pressure
* Heightened valuation uncertainty
How is commercial and investment property impacted by geopolitical instability?
Contributes to a “wait-and-see” investment environment, especially outside prime assets.
Key themes:
* Delayed investment decisions.
* Flight to quality (best located, best spec assets still transact).
* Development schemes stalled due to build cost inflation and financing risk.
How should the effects of the Middle East conflict be incorporated into property valuations?
DO NOT apply hypothetical war related adjustments to value (i.e. leading the market).
No transactional proof = no direct pricing adjustment.
Reflect shift in sentiment in commentary, not value.
This includes:
* note economic volatility/investor caution.
* point out absence of direct evidence.
* confirm valuation remains evidence based, not assumption driven.
Are you aware of any RICS guidance regarding AI?
When did this come into effect?
RICS Professional Standard:
Responsible use of artificial intelligence in surveying practice
9th March 2026
What is the status of the RICS AI guidance?
It is a mandatory RICS professional standard. Members must comply where AI has a MATERIAL IMPACT on the delivery of surveying services.
When does AI use have a “material impact”?
When AI outputs are capable of influencing how the surveying service is delivered, such as drafting opinions, summaries relied upon, or guiding inspections.
What must a surveyor do if AI use is material?
They must record, in writing:
- that AI use is material
- the reasoning behind that determination
What baseline knowledge must an APC candidate demonstrate if using AI?
Understanding of:
Does AI reduce a surveyor’s professional responsibility?
No.
Responsibility, judgement and accountability always remain with the surveyor.
What is meant by “professional judgement” when assessing AI outputs?
The application of:
How must reliance on AI outputs be evidenced?
By a written reliability assessment, setting out:
Who must take responsibility for AI outputs used?
A named, appropriately qualified surveyor, who accepts responsibility for their use.
Can AI outputs be used at scale without checking every result?
Yes, but firms must:
What data governance obligations apply to AI use?
Firms must:
What governance systems must firms have before using AI?
How often must AI risk registers be reviewed?
At least quarterly.
What due diligence is required before procuring AI?
Documented assessment of:
What if a supplier cannot provide full AI information?
The firm must identify and record the risk arising from missing information in the risk register.
What disclosure must be made to clients where AI is used?
(e.g. in Terms of Engagement)
In writing and in advance: