What is the first thread?
God is Onipotent
⇩
Paradox of the stone
⇩
God could make the imovable stone, but as long as he doesn’t God is omnipotent
⇩
A being that could stop being omnipotent is not God
What is the second thread?
God is omniscient
⇩
Free will vs Omniscience
⇩
God is everlasting
⇩
God can’t be everlasting
What is the third thread?
God is omnibenevolent
⇩
Euythyphro dilema
What is the paradox of the stone?
T1R1
What is: God could make the imovable stone, but as long as he doesn’t God is omnipotent
T1R2
What is: A being that could stop being omnipotent is not God
T1R3
Free will vs Omniscience
T2R1
God is everlasting
God Can’t be everlasting
Euythyphro dilema
There are two ways of understanding God omnibenevolence:
- Actions are good because God commands them
- Actions are good independently of God’s commands
- In the first case God cannot then give a moral justification for that action being good or not, as this requires a standard beyond him, making morality arbitrary as there is no reason God would pick something to be good over another
- In the second case this means that God is not the source of morality and therefore is not the supremely good being in the world.
- Therefore God cannot be omnibenevolent.