Two Bases to Challenge the Admissibility of Identification Evidence
Include:
DP Standard
If the D can prove that an identification procedures used by the gov was so unnecessarily suggestive that it created an irreparable risk of mistaken identification, the procedure violates DP and the ID is inadmissible. The test is whether the the ID is inherently unreliable.
What the D Must Prove to Satisfy the DP Standard
Application of DP Standard
The DP standard applies to all types of identifications (physical or photo) at all stages of the investigatory and prosecutorial process.
When an Identification is Suggestive and Unnecessary But Still Reliable (Important Factors)
TOC test including:
DP Standard: Necessary Suggestive Procedures
The use of inherently suggestive procedures because doing they are necessary under the circumstances (for example, because police believe the W is about to die) does not violate DP.
Sixth Amendment Standard
An out-of-court, in-person id procedure conducted after a formal charge is a critical stage in the adversarial process, therefore it violates the Sixth Amendment to conduct such a procedure unless the Ds counsel is present or the D executes a knowing and voluntary waiver.
Sixth Amendment Standard: Reason for Lawyer’s Absence?
It does not matter why the defense lawyer is not present at the out-of-court identification. Even if the police act in total good faith, and the lawyer is absent because of his own negligence, the requirement still applies.
Consequences for Violating the Sixth Amendment Standard
Include:
Photo Arrays
A D has no right to counsel at a photo array, regardless of whether it was pre-charge or post-charge.