Desirable when social mobility is present
Not desirable when it is a result of shrinking opportunities and discrimination
Inequality is self-reinforcing
Wealth begets power, which begets more wealth
Equality raises the living standards in a country
Equality - attainable if laws are put into place
SG’s Presidential for Minority Rights
7 in 10 people live in countries where the gap between the rich and poor is bigger than 3 decades ago
Even in Singapore, but we have to consider that the Gini co-efficient is not a good indication
Inequality is not inevitable; it is the result of the policies– we can push for fairer systems
just 1.5% of the combined wealth of the worlds billionaires is enough to provide for healthcare for the world’s poorest country, and pay for every child’s education
Important: SG – to reduce inequality; not just opportunities, but also resources
Benefitd of Meritocracy
Advocates fierce competition to push people to do the best they can
- indispensable in helping Singapore rise as a prosperous city-state
Meritocracy - SG
Meritocracy – has become an increasingly complicated ideology to juggle; especially in today’s competitive age
Like SG
Big income gaps may fuel resentment and result in growth destroying populist policies and even violence
France implemented an income tax of 75% for the wealthiest segment – turned away many people to Brussels and London
Often deep-rooted in society
New Delhi Gang Rape – allowed sexual violence to go unpunished
UN Goal for Poverty
To eliminate poverty by 2020, and to lift everyone above line of US$2 a day
With technology; reduce demand for many blue collar jobs
Inequality will only rise
Difficult to eradicate due to the deep rooted corruption in most bureaucracies
2004