whats null hypothesis
saying that resluts are due to chance
whats alternative/experimental hypothesis
saying that results are due to experimental effect, not chance.
whats the logic behind null hypothesis testing (3 steps)
differentiate between one tailed and two tailed hypothesis tests
two tailed hypothesis tests are non directional - hence two tails at either end, alpha is split in two
one tailed hypothesis test is directional - hence one tail, equal to alpha
describe one sample Z test
involves calculation of standard error: σM=σ/(√n)=(population SD)/√(sample size)
Then calculating Z score: z=(M-μ)/σM
describe one sample T test
involves calcuating standard error, but with sample SD replacing mean SD
SM=S/(√n)=(sample SD)/√(sample size)
then we calculate T score: t=(M-μ)/SM
requires normal distribution and interval/ ratio data
describe independent samples T test
when theres 2 samples, and they’re both independent of each other
requires normal distributino, interval/ratio data, homogeinty of samples
describe paired samples T test
two samples but are paired in some way.
requires normal distribution and interval/ratio data
why does sample size conofund effect size
because its used in all NHST’s, which generates p value; and p value is therefore not only due to effect size but due to sample size
describe cohen’s d, and ranges of scores
Cohen’s d = |(mean distance)/SD|
>0.5 = small effect size
0.5-0.8 = medium effect size
>0.8 = large effect size
describe type one error
false positive: incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis
= alpha
describe type two error:
false negative: incorrectly accepting the nullh hypothesis
= beta
describe power
1-beta
when we correctly reject the null hypothesis
what is good power?
0.8
ways of increasing power?
increasing alpha (but this increases type I error)
increasing effect size (eg. exposure to treatment)
increasing sample size
using within participants design