What is Informalisation/Conversationalisation/Demotization?
It is the incorporation of aspects of intimate, personal discourse into public forms of spoken and written communication.
What does Informalisation give a sense of and the appropriate example?
There’s a sense of “border crossing” in this process, a barrier that can now be crossed. To see the new possibilities and opportunities that are available as opposed to the regular.
An example would a teacher using terms of endearment such as chick, duck, sweetheart with children in a professional context.
Give an example of Informalisation?
Email discourse is a ‘paradigmatic example of the informalisation process’
Email discourse is a CMC, it is synchronous as opposed to letters that are asynchronous.
Email can incorporate emoticons, acronyms and initialisms.
Omissions in email are typical especially when replying to one.
What stays the same in Informalisation and give an example of how it can be evidenced?
The relationship remains intact (between the intimate and the professional) but rather the language is changing.
Informalisation comes in all level of societies…
Camilla Parker Bowles responded with “It’s wicked” when asked her reaction to the news of Prince William and Kate Middleton’s engagement
Give me 5 features of Informalisation
Give me an observation
How is Informalisation & Marketization connected?
What is a an example of how Marketization and Informalisation are being connected?
What is Marketisation and why is it important in terms of Informalisation?
What is Conversationalisation?
Conversationalisation: Involves the spread into public domain of linguistic features generally associated with conversation.
What is Personalisation?
Personalisation: The construction of personal relationship between producers and receivers of public discourse.
What does Fairclough (give date) argue about “the engineering of informality” in terms of Conversationlisation and Personalisation?
Fairclough (1996) argues that the engineering of informality is interwoven with conversationalisation and personalisation.
Power plays an important role behind this, there is a trend of elite adopting covert prestige forms, in other words speaking like everybody else such as George Osbourne.
What are the advantages & disavtanges of elites such as George Osbourne using such stragedies?
However, the disadvantage is that this sounds artificial. In the words of Fairclough, ‘synthetic personalisation only stimulates solidarity, and is a strategy of containment hiding coercion and manipulation under a veneer of equality.’ What Fairclough is also implying here, is that equality cannot be created by just using informalisation. More needs to be done.
What are the 3 things that the media is able to do with informalisation?
What is the first study to confirm this and what does this say about Informalisation?
Sanders and Redeker (1993) readers appreciated the insertion of ‘free’ and ‘indirect’ thoughts, although this was evaluated as being ‘less suitable for the news text genre.’
What is the second study to confirm this and what does this say about informalisation?
Pearce (2005) points out that public discourse i.e. news texts and political texts, is influenced by a general trend towards informalisation.
How are the 3 ways Informalisation can link with Language Change?