argument from Plato
learning is simply recalling innate knowledge. Meno’s slave boy argument
argument from Leibniz
contingent and necessary truths. our knowledge of necessary truths are innate
Locke’s argument against innatism
no universal consent - there are no examples of propositions or beliefs that are held universally
tabula rasa response
Locke argues all knowledge comes from sensations or reflections
response to plato’s argument
could argue that slave boy used reason rather than innate knowledge to work out correct answer
simple and complex ideas response
all humans can form knowledge from experience incl. complex concept eg. God. simple concepts - looking at a clear sky, sensation of blue gives simple concept of blueness. complex concepts - made up of simple concepts eg. chair, brown, hard, wooden etc. abstract concepts - see a beautiful lake, beautiful painting etc. - form abstract concept of beauty
leibniz response to tabula rasa
argues that identity and noncontradiction are innately present - block of marble with veins
contingent truth
what IS the case. could’ve been false in some other world. eg. ‘this website exists’
necessary truths
what MUST BE the case. true in every possible world. eg. 2+2=4
slave boy argument