lipman
(voluntary) D will not be convicted of a specific intent crime if the intoxication prevents him from forming the mens rea.
gallagher
drunken intent is still intent. Dutch courage
majewski
voluntary intox will never be a defence to basic intent crimes, as drinking is reckless, transferred malice.
kingston
if D has mens rea for specific intent despite intox, will still be guilty.
allen
involuntary intox has to be completely involuntary (not knowing the strength is not an excuse)
hardie
cannot be guilty of a basic intent crime if involuntary intoxication as they were not reckless in taking substance.
o’grady
cant have a drunken mistake when it comes to self-defence or intox.